Iruthayarajah J, McIntyre A, Mirkowski M, Welch-West P, Loh E, Teasell R
Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, London, ON, Canada.
Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada.
Spinal Cord. 2018 Dec;56(12):1116-1123. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0170-3. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
To determine the risk factors predictive of dysphagia after a spinal cord injury (SCI).
None.
A comprehensive literature search was performed in five scientific databases for English articles that identified risk factors for dysphagia after a SCI in adult (≥19 years) individuals. Data extracted included: author name, year and country of publication, participant demographics, sample size, study design, method of dysphagia diagnosis, and risk factor percentages. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For identified risk factors, risk percentages were transformed into risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative synthesis was performed for risk factors reported in two or more studies using restricted maximum-likelihood estimator random effects models.
Eleven studies met inclusion criteria of which ten studies were of moderate quality (n = 10). Significant risk factors included: age, injury severity, level of injury, presence of tracheostomy, coughing, voice quality, bronchoscopy need, pneumonia, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tubes, comorbid injury, and a cervical surgery. Results of the quantitative synthesis indicated that the presence of a tracheostomy posed a threefold greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 3.67); while, cervical surgery posed a 1.3 times greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 1.30).
Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early diagnosis and appropriate medical management of dysphagia post SCI.
系统评价与荟萃分析。
确定脊髓损伤(SCI)后吞咽困难的预测风险因素。
无。
在五个科学数据库中进行全面的文献检索,查找有关成年(≥19岁)个体SCI后吞咽困难风险因素的英文文章。提取的数据包括:作者姓名、发表年份和国家、参与者人口统计学信息、样本量、研究设计、吞咽困难诊断方法以及风险因素百分比。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究的方法学质量。对于确定的风险因素,将风险百分比转换为风险比(RR)并给出95%置信区间。使用限制最大似然估计随机效应模型对两项或更多研究报告的风险因素进行定量综合分析。
11项研究符合纳入标准,其中10项研究质量中等(n = 10)。显著的风险因素包括:年龄、损伤严重程度、损伤平面、气管切开术、咳嗽、嗓音质量、是否需要支气管镜检查、肺炎、机械通气、鼻胃管、合并损伤以及颈椎手术。定量综合分析结果表明,气管切开术使吞咽困难发生风险增加三倍(RR:3.67);而颈椎手术使吞咽困难发生风险增加1.3倍(RR:1.30)。
了解这些风险因素可为临床医生早期诊断和合理治疗SCI后吞咽困难提供参考。