Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa Staff Anesthesiologist, General Campus, 501 Smyth Rd, Critical Care Wing 1401, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa Staff Anesthesiologist, Civic Campus, Room B307, 1053 Carling Avenue, Mail Stop 249, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Jun;33(3):541-542. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0178-4. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Following introduction of an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) at a tertiary care, academic health sciences centre, a quality assurance initiative was conducted to assess staff opinions of the AIMS using a previously published, anonymous survey tool at 1 and 5 years following AIMS introduction. At 5 years compared to 1 year after implementation of AIMS, the majority (18 of 24, 75%) of responses to the survey questions had a statistically significant change (P < 0.05) in the proportion of respondents favoring AIMS compared to the 1 year survey. Domains noted to be more favorable 5 years compared to 1 year after AIMS introduction included patient safety in the Operating Rooms and Post-Anesthesia Care Unit, quality of handover and overall documentation, and communication amongst healthcare workers. The ideal time period at which to assess AIMS after introduction is not clear.
在一家三级保健、学术健康科学中心引入麻醉信息管理系统 (AIMS) 后，开展了一项质量保证举措，使用之前发布的匿名调查工具，在引入 AIMS 后 1 年和 5 年评估工作人员对 AIMS 的意见。与实施 AIMS 后 1 年相比，在实施 AIMS 后 5 年，调查问题的大多数（24 个中的 18 个，75%）的回复在赞成 AIMS 的比例上具有统计学意义上的变化（P<0.05），与 1 年调查相比。与引入 AIMS 后 1 年相比，5 年后被认为更有利的领域包括手术室和麻醉后护理单元的患者安全、交接班和整体文件记录的质量，以及医疗保健人员之间的沟通。引入 AIMS 后评估其的理想时间段尚不清楚。
