1 School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
2 Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518783608. doi: 10.1177/2331216518783608.
Current approaches to the measurement of hearing aid benefit typically use clinical or laboratory-based speech perception tests or retrospective self-report surveys. However, when assessing hearing aid outcomes in adults with mild hearing impairment, the traditional outcome measures may not be sufficiently sensitive. An alternative to these techniques are approaches that capture data about real-world experiences as they are experienced, such as ecological momentary assessment. This single-subject experimental design pilot study investigated the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment in assessing whether hearing aids make a difference to the real-world listening experiences of adults with mild hearing impairment. Ten participants with an average age of 70 years and no previous amplification experience answered survey questions on their listening experiences over a 4-week period (1 week without hearing aids, 2 weeks with hearing aids, and 1 week without hearing aids). A total of 860 surveys were collected. Participants reported significantly better speech understanding and less listening effort during the 2-week trial with hearing aids compared to baseline conditions. In addition, they reported that they were significantly less hampered by their hearing difficulties and had greater enjoyment of listening events with wearing hearing aids. Individual variation in hearing aid benefit was evident. This pilot study showed that ecological momentary assessment has potential to quantify self-reported aided benefit for individuals with mild hearing impairment fitted with hearing aids. This research also highlighted that a real-world approach is needed to explore individualized outcomes and provide different insights to standardized questionnaires.
目前评估助听器效果的方法通常使用临床或实验室的言语感知测试或回顾性自我报告调查。然而,当评估轻度听力障碍成年人的助听器效果时,传统的评估方法可能不够敏感。这些技术的替代方法是捕捉关于真实体验的数据,例如生态瞬间评估。本单例实验设计初步研究调查了使用生态瞬间评估来评估助听器是否对轻度听力障碍成年人的真实听力体验产生影响的可行性。10 名平均年龄为 70 岁且无先前放大经验的参与者在 4 周的时间内(1 周不戴助听器,2 周戴助听器,1 周不戴助听器)回答了关于他们听力体验的调查问题。共收集了 860 份调查问卷。与基线条件相比,参与者在佩戴助听器的 2 周试验中报告了明显更好的言语理解和更少的听力努力。此外,他们报告说,佩戴助听器时,他们的听力困难明显减轻,对听力事件的享受也增加了。助听器效果的个体差异明显。这项初步研究表明,生态瞬间评估有可能量化轻度听力障碍佩戴助听器的个体的自我报告辅助效果。这项研究还强调,需要采用一种真实的方法来探索个性化的结果,并为标准化问卷提供不同的见解。