Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct;46(10):1570-1576. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003302.
The electronic health record is a primary source of information for all professional groups participating in ICU rounds. We previously demonstrated that, individually, all professional groups involved in rounds have significant blind spots in recognition of patient safety issues in the electronic health record. However, it is unclear how team dynamics impacts identification and verbalization of viewed data. Therefore, we created an ICU rounding simulation to assess how the interprofessional team recognized and reported data and its impact on decision-making.
Each member of the ICU team reviewed a simulated ICU chart in the electronic health record which contained embedded patient safety issues. The team conducted simulated rounds according to the ICU's existing rounding script and was assessed for recognition of safety issues.
Academic medical center.
ICU residents, nurses, and pharmacists.
None.
Twenty-eight teams recognized 68.6% of safety issues with only 50% teams having the primary diagnosis in their differential. Individually, interns, nurses, and pharmacists recognized 30.4%, 15.6%, and 19.6% of safety items, respectively. However, there was a negative correlation between the intern's performance and the nurse's or the pharmacist's performance within a given team. The wide variance in recognition of data resulted in wide variance in orders. Overall, there were 21.8 orders requested and 21.6 orders placed per case resulting in 3.6 order entry inconsistencies/case. Between the two cases, there were 145 distinct orders place with 43% being unique to a specific team and only 2% placed by all teams.
Although significant blind spots exist in the interprofessional team's ability to recognize safety issues in the electronic health record, the inclusion of other professional groups does serve as a partial safety net to improve recognition. Electronic health record-based, ICU rounding simulations can serve as a test-bed for innovations in ICU rounding structure and data collection.
电子病历是参与 ICU 查房的所有专业团队的主要信息来源。我们之前的研究表明,在单独情况下,参与查房的所有专业团队在识别电子病历中的患者安全问题方面都存在明显的盲点。然而,团队动态如何影响所查看数据的识别和表述尚不清楚。因此,我们创建了一个 ICU 查房模拟,以评估跨专业团队如何识别和报告数据,以及其对决策的影响。
ICU 团队的每位成员都在电子病历中查看了一份模拟 ICU 图表,其中包含嵌入式患者安全问题。团队根据 ICU 现有的查房脚本进行模拟查房,并评估对安全问题的识别情况。
学术医疗中心。
ICU 住院医师、护士和药剂师。
无。
28 个团队识别出 68.6%的安全问题,只有 50%的团队在鉴别诊断中包含主要诊断。单独来看,住院医师、护士和药剂师分别识别出 30.4%、15.6%和 19.6%的安全项目。然而,在给定团队中,住院医师的表现与护士或药剂师的表现之间存在负相关。数据识别的巨大差异导致医嘱的巨大差异。总体而言,每个病例有 21.8 个医嘱请求和 21.6 个医嘱下达,导致每例有 3.6 次医嘱录入不一致。在两个病例之间,有 145 个不同的医嘱下达,其中 43%是特定团队特有的,只有 2%是所有团队都下达的。
尽管跨专业团队识别电子病历中安全问题的能力存在明显的盲点,但纳入其他专业团队确实可以作为提高识别能力的部分安全网。基于电子病历的 ICU 查房模拟可以作为 ICU 查房结构和数据收集创新的测试平台。