• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简化版术后房颤风险评分的性能与验证

Performance and validation of a simplified postoperative atrial fibrillation risk score.

作者信息

Chen Lizhu, Du Xin, Dong Jianzeng, Ma Chang-Sheng

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1136-1142. doi: 10.1111/pace.13434. Epub 2018 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1111/pace.13434
PMID:29959797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) occurs in 20-40% patients who received isolated coronary artery cardiac bypass surgery (CABG). Several POAF risk prediction models have been developed, but none of them is widely adopted in practice. Our objective was to derive and validate a simple scoring system to estimate POAF risk after isolated CABG, using easily available clinical information.

METHODS

Medical records of 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG were reviewed. The data of first 700 patients were used for model derivation and data of the remaining 300 patients were used for model validation. Discrimination and calibration of the newly developed model were assessed.

RESULTS

POAF incidence in both the derivation and validation cohorts was 27.3%. Age ≥65, history of hypertension, heart failure, and myocardial infarction were independently associated with POAF risk. Risk scores were calculated by summing weighting points for each independent predictor. The score ≥3 was associated with high POAF incidence (41.1% in the derivation cohort and 44.3% in the validation cohort). The positive and negative POAF predictive value was 41.1% and 78.5%, respectively, in the derivation cohort, and 44.3% and 80.8%, respectively, in the validation cohort, when the cut-point score ≥3 was used. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test P-values were 0.917 and 0.894 in the derivation cohort and validation cohort, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This POAF risk following isolated CABG can be predicted with simple patient characteristic during the preoperative period. Patients with high risk scores (≥3) may constitute a target population for POAF prevention and prolonged postoperative surveillance.

摘要

背景

接受单纯冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)的患者中,术后房颤(POAF)的发生率为20%-40%。已经开发了几种POAF风险预测模型,但在实践中均未被广泛采用。我们的目标是使用易于获得的临床信息,推导并验证一种简单的评分系统,以估计单纯CABG术后的POAF风险。

方法

回顾了1000例连续接受单纯CABG手术患者的病历。前700例患者的数据用于模型推导,其余300例患者的数据用于模型验证。评估新开发模型的辨别力和校准度。

结果

推导队列和验证队列中的POAF发生率均为27.3%。年龄≥65岁、高血压病史、心力衰竭和心肌梗死与POAF风险独立相关。通过对每个独立预测因素的加权分数求和来计算风险评分。评分≥3与高POAF发生率相关(推导队列中为41.1%,验证队列中为44.3%)。当使用切点评分≥3时,推导队列中POAF的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为41.1%和78.5%,验证队列中分别为44.3%和80.8%。推导队列和验证队列中Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验的P值分别为0.917和0.894。

结论

术前通过简单的患者特征即可预测单纯CABG术后的POAF风险。高风险评分(≥3)的患者可能构成POAF预防和延长术后监测的目标人群。

相似文献

1
Performance and validation of a simplified postoperative atrial fibrillation risk score.简化版术后房颤风险评分的性能与验证
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1136-1142. doi: 10.1111/pace.13434. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
2
Prospective External Validation of Three Preoperative Risk Scores for Prediction of New Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.三种术前风险评分对心脏手术后新发房颤预测的前瞻性外部验证
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):33-38. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002112.
3
Predictors of post-operative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.行单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术患者术后心房颤动的预测因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(1):195-201. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0203. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Bayesian Analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤的预测因素:一项贝叶斯分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.115. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
5
Prediction of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: is CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score useful?冠状动脉搭桥手术后房颤的预测:CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分有用吗?
Ann Card Anaesth. 2014 Jul-Sep;17(3):182-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.135841.
6
Fragmented QRS may predict postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery.碎裂QRS波可能预测接受单纯冠状动脉旁路移植手术患者的术后心房颤动。
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2012 Nov;12(7):576-83. doi: 10.5152/akd.2012.184. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
7
Red Cell Distribution Width with CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc score is associated with Post-operative Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.红细胞分布宽度与CHADS2及CHA2DS2-VASc评分与冠状动脉旁路移植术后房颤相关。
Heart Surg Forum. 2018 May 16;21(3):E170-E174. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1886.
8
Prediction of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation using a simple Nomogram.使用简单诺莫图预测新发性术后心房颤动。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 12;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02198-1.
9
Risk Factors of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in the Recent 10 Years: Clinical Analysis of 6229 Patients.近 10 年单纯冠状动脉旁路移植术后心房颤动的危险因素:6229 例患者的临床分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Oct;47(10):e24335. doi: 10.1002/clc.24335.
10
Predictors of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Isolated On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients ≥60 Years Old.60岁及以上患者单纯体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后房颤的预测因素
Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Feb 28;20(1):E038-E042. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1583.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylaxis for postoperative atrial fibrillation: Impact of the implementation of a medication bundle protocol.术后心房颤动的预防:药物组合方案实施的影响
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jun 6;20:37-39. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.014. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Post-cardiotomy pericardial effusion and postoperative atrial fibrillation risk.心脏术后心包积液与术后心房颤动风险。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;38(8):1873-1879. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02560-9. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Significance of Intraoperative Medication Data and Predictive Model Selection for Predicting Postoperative First-Time Atrial Fibrillation.
术中用药数据及预测模型选择对预测术后首次发生心房颤动的意义
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:320-329. eCollection 2023.