• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四孔法与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术团队工作量比较。

Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.

Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005
PMID:29960648
Abstract

Advanced minimally invasive procedures may cause postural constraints and increased workload and stress for providers. This study compared workload and stress across surgical team roles for 48 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (4-port vs single-port) using a task load index (NASA-TLX), a procedural difficulty question, and salivary stress hormones. Statistical analyses were performed based on the presence intra-cluster correlation within team roles, at α=0.05. The single-port technique resulted in an 89% increase in physical workload for the surgeon and 63% increase for the assistant (both p<0.05). The surgeon had significantly higher salivary stress hormones during single-port surgeries. The degree of procedural difficulty was positively correlated between the surgeon and most roles: resident (r=0.67), assistant (r=0.81), and technician (r=0.81). There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the surgeon and assistant for all selfreported workload measures (p<0.05). The single-port technique requires further improvement to balance surgical team workload for optimal patient safety and satisfaction.

摘要

先进的微创手术可能会给提供者带来姿势限制和增加工作量和压力。本研究通过任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)、手术难度问题和唾液应激激素,比较了 48 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术(4 端口与单端口)中手术团队角色的工作量和压力。基于团队角色内的群内相关,在 α=0.05 时进行了统计分析。单端口技术使外科医生的体力工作量增加了 89%,助手的体力工作量增加了 63%(均 p<0.05)。外科医生在单端口手术期间唾液应激激素水平显著升高。手术难度程度与外科医生和大多数角色之间呈正相关:住院医师(r=0.67)、助手(r=0.81)和技术员(r=0.81)。外科医生和助手之间的所有自我报告的工作量指标均呈统计学显著正相关(p<0.05)。单端口技术需要进一步改进,以平衡手术团队的工作量,从而实现最佳的患者安全和满意度。

相似文献

1
Surgical team workload comparison for 4-port and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures.四孔法与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术团队工作量比较。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jul;78:277-285. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Impact of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and workload: a randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)对手术医生压力和工作量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1205-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4332-5. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
3
A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Single-Site Robotic and Multi-port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center.单孔机器人与多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术疗效的比较研究:来自三级医疗中心的经验
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1246-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3799-0.
4
Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery: Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty.外科医生在结直肠手术中的工作量:感知到的操作难度驱动因素。
J Surg Res. 2020 Jan;245:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.084. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
Quantifying Intraoperative Workloads Across the Surgical Team Roles: Room for Better Balance?量化手术团队各角色的术中工作量:是否有实现更好平衡的空间?
World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1565-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3449-6.
6
Integration of Hands-On Team Training into Existing Curriculum Improves Both Technical and Nontechnical Skills in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.将实践团队培训融入现有课程可提高腹腔镜胆囊切除术的技术和非技术技能。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
[Single-port access cholecystectomy is a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison of single-port access versus standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[单孔通道胆囊切除术是传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的一种安全替代方法:单孔通道与标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的回顾性比较]
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Feb;138(1):70-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283886. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
8
Advantages and Disadvantages of 1-Incision, 2-Incision, 3-Incision, and 4-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Workflow Comparison Study.单切口、双切口、三切口及四切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术的优缺点:一项工作流程比较研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Aug;26(4):313-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000283.
9
NASA-Task Load Index Differentiates Surgical Approach: Opportunities for Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery.NASA 任务负荷指数区分手术入路:结直肠手术改进的机会。
Ann Surg. 2020 May;271(5):906-912. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003173.
10
SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:技术要点与结果
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018 Aug 16;31(3):e1388. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of biological changes in surgeons' acute stress levels during surgery.一项关于外科医生手术期间急性应激水平生物学变化的系统评价。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 May 25;13:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100174. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Advances in objective assessment of ergonomics in endoscopic surgery: a review.内镜手术工效学客观评估的研究进展:综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1281194. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281194. eCollection 2023.
3
Examining workload variations among different surgical team roles, specialties, and techniques: a multicenter cross-sectional descriptive study.
考察不同手术团队角色、专业及技术之间的工作量差异:一项多中心横断面描述性研究。
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jan 2;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00356-6.
4
Human Factors Approach to Assess Physician Workload in Elective Plastic Surgery Breast Procedures.采用人为因素方法评估择期整形外科乳房手术中的医生工作量。
Eplasty. 2023 Aug 17;23:e49. eCollection 2023.
5
Perceived Patient Workload and Its Impact on Outcomes During New Cancer Patient Visits: Analysis of a Convenience Sample.新癌症患者就诊期间感知到的患者工作量及其对治疗结果的影响:便利样本分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Aug 18;10:e49490. doi: 10.2196/49490.
6
Unpacking the Broad Landscape of Intraoperative Stressors for Clinical Personnel: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.剖析临床人员术中应激源的广阔图景:一项混合方法的系统综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Jul 17;16:1953-1977. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S401325. eCollection 2023.
7
Surgeons' workload assessment during indocyanine-assisted deep endometriosis surgery using the surgery task load index: The impact of the learning curve.使用手术任务负荷指数评估吲哚菁绿辅助深部子宫内膜异位症手术期间外科医生的工作量:学习曲线的影响
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 5;9:982922. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.982922. eCollection 2022.
8
Intraoperative musculoskeletal discomfort and risk for surgeons during open and laparoscopic surgery.术中肌肉骨骼不适和开放与腹腔镜手术中外科医生的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6335-6343. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08085-3. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
9
Workload Differentiates Breast Surgical Procedures: NSM Associated with Higher Workload Demand than SSM.手术量区分乳腺外科手术:NSM 比 SSM 工作量需求更高。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May;27(5):1318-1326. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08159-0. Epub 2020 Jan 8.