Department of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Physics, Maxima Medisch Centrum locatie Veldhoven, Veldhoven, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e022813. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022813.
To determine differences in alarm pressure between two otherwise comparable neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) differing in architectural layout-one of a single-family room (SFR) design and the other of an open bay area (OBA) design.
Retrospective audit of more than 2000 patient days from each NICU cataloguing the differences in the number and duration of alarms for critical and alerting alarms, as well as the interaction of clinicians with the patient monitor.
Two level 3 NICUs.
A total of more than 150 000 critical and 1.2 million alerting alarms were acquired from the two NICUs. The number of audible alarms and the associated noise pollution varied considerably with the OBA NICU generating 44% more alarms per infant per day even though the SFR NICU generated 2.5 as many critical desaturation alarms per infant per day.
Differences in the architectural layout of NICUs and the consequent differences in delays, thresholds and distribution systems for alarms are associated with differences in alarm pressure.
比较两个设计不同的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)之间的报警压力差异,一个是单家庭病房(SFR)设计,另一个是开放式床位区(OBA)设计。
对每个 NICU 的超过 2000 个患者日进行回顾性审核,记录关键和警示报警的数量和持续时间,以及临床医生与患者监护仪之间的交互差异。
两个 3 级 NICU。
从两个 NICU 共获得超过 150000 个关键报警和 120 万个警示报警。可听报警数量和相关噪声污染差异很大,OBA NICU 每天每婴儿产生的报警数量比 SFR NICU 多 44%,尽管 SFR NICU 每天每婴儿产生的严重低氧饱和度报警数量多 2.5 倍。
NICU 的建筑布局差异以及报警的延迟、阈值和分布系统的差异与报警压力的差异有关。