1 Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder.
2 Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):512-517. doi: 10.1177/1745691618774535.
The authors acknowledge and respond to three concerns raised by Weber (2018) about oversimplifying psychological barriers to climate policy. First, skepticism about climate change remains a major barrier to climate policy, along with political partisanship. Second, recognizing multifaceted barriers to climate policy calls for multiple targeted interventions to be implemented at critical junctures. Finally, translating pro-environmental attitudes into action requires an appreciation of proximate sociopolitical contexts and cultures. Rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, psychological scientists are well equipped to understand and address the complex barriers to climate policy within the natural flow of everyday social life.
作者回应了 Weber(2018 年)提出的关于简化气候政策心理障碍的三个担忧。首先,对气候变化的怀疑仍然是气候政策的主要障碍,还有政治党派之争。其次,认识到气候政策的多方面障碍需要在关键节点实施多个有针对性的干预措施。最后,将环保态度转化为行动需要对近在咫尺的社会政治背景和文化有深刻的理解。心理科学家有能力在日常生活的自然流动中理解和应对复杂的气候政策障碍,而不是一刀切的方法。