Kuendgen Andrea, Müller-Thomas Catharina, Lauseker Michael, Haferlach Torsten, Urbaniak Petra, Schroeder Thomas, Brings Carolin, Wulfert Michael, Meggendorfer Manja, Hildebrandt Barbara, Betz Beate, Royer-Pokora Brigitte, Gattermann Norbert, Haas Rainer, Germing Ulrich, Götze Katharina S
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department of Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Oncotarget. 2018 Jun 12;9(45):27882-27894. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25328.
Azacitidine is the first drug to demonstrate a survival benefit for patients with MDS. However, only half of patients respond and almost all patients eventually relapse. Limited and conflicting data are available on predictive factors influencing response. We analyzed 128 patients from two institutions with MDS or AML treated with azacitidine to identify prognostic indicators. Genetic mutations in and were assessed by next-generation sequencing. With a median follow up of 5.6 years median survival was 1.3 years with a response rate of 49%. The only variable with significant influence on response was del(20q). All 6 patients responded ( = 0.012) but survival was not improved. No other clinical, cytogenetic or molecular marker for response or survival was identified. Interestingly, patients from poor-risk groups as high-risk cytogenetics (55%), t-MDS/AML (54%), TP53 mutated (48%) or relapsed after chemotherapy (60%) showed a high response rate. Factors associated with shorter survival were low platelets, AML vs. MDS, therapy-related disease, and -. In multivariate analysis anemia, platelets, -ITD, and therapy-related disease remained in the model. Poor-risk factors such as del(7q)/-7, complex karyotype, and did not show an independent impact. Thus, no clear biomarker for response and survival can be identified. Although a number of publications on predictive markers for response to AZA exist, results are inconsistent and improved response rates did not translate to improved survival. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview comparing the studies published to date.
阿扎胞苷是首个被证明对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者有生存获益的药物。然而,只有一半的患者有反应,且几乎所有患者最终都会复发。关于影响反应的预测因素,现有数据有限且相互矛盾。我们分析了来自两个机构的128例接受阿扎胞苷治疗的MDS或急性髓系白血病(AML)患者,以确定预后指标。通过二代测序评估了[具体基因名称1]和[具体基因名称2]的基因突变。中位随访5.6年,中位生存期为1.3年,反应率为49%。对反应有显著影响的唯一变量是20号染色体长臂缺失(del(20q))。所有6例有此情况的患者均有反应(P = 0.012),但生存期并未改善。未发现其他用于预测反应或生存的临床、细胞遗传学或分子标志物。有趣的是,来自高危组的患者,如具有高危细胞遗传学特征(55%)、治疗相关的MDS/AML(54%)、TP53突变(48%)或化疗后复发(60%)的患者,显示出较高的反应率。与生存期较短相关的因素包括血小板计数低、AML与MDS、治疗相关疾病、[具体基因3]和[具体基因4]。在多变量分析中,贫血、血小板、[具体基因3]内部串联重复(-ITD)和治疗相关疾病仍在模型中。诸如7号染色体长臂缺失(del(7q)/-7)、复杂核型、[具体基因5]和[具体基因6]等高危因素并未显示出独立影响。因此,无法确定明确的反应和生存生物标志物。尽管有许多关于阿扎胞苷反应预测标志物的出版物,但结果并不一致,反应率的提高并未转化为生存期的改善。在此,我们提供了一个全面的综述,比较了迄今为止发表的研究。