Xu Hua-Shan, Zhao Lei, Sun Hao-Su, Ren Yu-Fen, Ding Tao, Chang Shuai, Wang Hai-Dong, Li Miao, Guo Zhao
Daning Management Office of the Beijing South-to-North Water Diversion, Beijing 102442, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Apr 8;38(4):1357-1365. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201607068.
Water quality is the key problem that water management departments concern. Water quality of Beijing segment of South-to-North Water Diversion Middle Route Project is closely related to water security and social stability in Beijing. Since the connection of Beijing part in Middle Route of South-to-North Diversion Project, water quality data of Daning regulation and storage reservoir and Daning surge tank was collected, and water quality indexes including water temperature, total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, chloride ion, sulfate, dissolved oxygen, permanganate index, pH, ammonia nitrogen, fluorine ion and total phosphorus, were monitored monthly. With variance analysis, water quality difference among different water sources of the South-to-North Water Diversion of Middle Route was analyzed. With factor analysis method, the water quality risk factors of Daning regulation and storage reservoir and Daning surge tank were identified. The results were as following, water from Hebei province had higher contents of nitrate nitrogen, total nitrogen, fluorine ion, chloride ion and sulfate than those of water from Danjiangkou reservoir, but the water quality was not as good as that from Danjiangkou reservoir. LSD difference test results showed that the dissolved oxygen, nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen of the water from Hebei province had significant differences (<0.05) between flood season and non-flood season, there was significant difference (<0.05) in pH of water from Danjiangkou reservoir between flood season and non-flood season, and the water quality of Danjiangkou reservoir was more stable than water from Heibei province. No matter in flood season or non-flood season, there were no significant differences (<0.05) in pH, dissolved oxygen, permanganate index, total phosphorus and ammonia nitrogen between the water from Danjiangkou reservoir and Heibei province, but there were significant differences (<0.05) in nitrate nitrogen, total nitrogen, fluorine ion and sulfate ion and chloride ion. Contents of Nitrate nitrogen, total nitrogen, sulfate and chloride ion in 2015 (the mixture of water from Hebei province and Danjiangkou reservoir) in Daning regulation and storage reservoir were lower than those in 2012-2014 (water from Hebei province), and the water from Danjiangkou reservoir played a key role in dilution and adjustment of the water from Hebei province in Daning regulation and storage reservoir. The water quality differences test results between 2012-2014 and 2015 showed that there were significant differences (<0.05) in the nitrate nitrogen, total nitrogen, fluorine ion, sulfate and chloride ion both in flood season and non-flood season, and the water quality of 2015 was better than that of 2012~2014 in non-flood season, but the differences of pH, dissolved oxygen, permanganate index, total phosphorus, ammonia nitrogen were not obvious (<0.05). The difference test results between Daning regulation and storage reservoir and Daning surge tank showed that Permanganate index, total nitrogen, fluorine ion, sulfate and chloride ion had significant differences (<0.05) both in flood season and non-flood season, and the contents of permanganate index, fluorine ion, sulfate and chloride ions in Daning regulation and storage reservoir were higher than those in Daning surge tank. The factor analysis results indicated that water quality potential risk factors both in Daning regulation and storage reservoir and Daning surge tank were mainly nitrogen, including ammonia nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen and total nitrogen, and potential risk factors also included total phosphorus in Daning regulation and storage reservoir.
水质是水管理部门关注的关键问题。南水北调中线工程北京段的水质与北京的水安全和社会稳定密切相关。自南水北调中线工程北京段通水以来,收集了大宁调蓄水库和大宁调压池的水质数据,每月监测水温、总氮、硝酸盐氮、氯离子、硫酸根、溶解氧、高锰酸盐指数、pH值、氨氮、氟离子和总磷等水质指标。通过方差分析,分析了南水北调中线不同水源的水质差异。采用因子分析法,识别了大宁调蓄水库和大宁调压池的水质风险因素。结果如下,河北省来水的硝酸盐氮、总氮、氟离子、氯离子和硫酸根含量高于丹江口水库来水,但水质不如丹江口水库来水。LSD差异检验结果表明,河北省来水的溶解氧、硝酸盐氮和总氮在汛期和非汛期有显著差异(<0.05),丹江口水库来水的pH值在汛期和非汛期有显著差异(<0.05),且丹江口水库的水质比河北省来水更稳定。无论汛期还是非汛期,丹江口水库来水与河北省来水的pH值、溶解氧、高锰酸盐指数、总磷和氨氮均无显著差异(<0.05),但硝酸盐氮、总氮、氟离子、硫酸根离子和氯离子有显著差异(<0.05)。大宁调蓄水库2015年(河北省来水与丹江口水库来水混合)的硝酸盐氮、总氮、硫酸根和氯离子含量低于2012 - 2014年(河北省来水),丹江口水库来水对大宁调蓄水库中河北省来水起到了关键的稀释和调节作用。2012 - 2014年与2015年的水质差异检验结果表明,汛期和非汛期的硝酸盐氮、总氮、氟离子、硫酸根和氯离子均有显著差异(<0.05),非汛期2015年的水质优于2012 - 2014年,但pH值、溶解氧、高锰酸盐指数、总磷、氨氮的差异不明显(<0.05)。大宁调蓄水库与大宁调压池的差异检验结果表明,高锰酸盐指数、总氮、氟离子、硫酸根和氯离子在汛期和非汛期均有显著差异(<0.05),大宁调蓄水库的高锰酸盐指数、氟离子、硫酸根和氯离子含量高于大宁调压池。因子分析结果表明,大宁调蓄水库和大宁调压池的水质潜在风险因素主要是氮,包括氨氮、硝酸盐氮和总氮,大宁调蓄水库的潜在风险因素还包括总磷。