• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮胆囊造瘘术后的管理:我们该如何处理导管?

Management After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: What Should We do With the Catheter?

作者信息

Charrier Thibaut, Kepenekian Vahan, Muller Arnaud, Valette Pierre-Jean, Glehen Olivier, Cotte Eddy, Passot Guillaume

机构信息

Departments of General and Oncologic Surgery.

Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Aug;28(4):256-260. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000559.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0000000000000559
PMID:29965896
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an alternative to cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) in patients with high mortality risk, but the catheters' and patients' management remains unclear. This study aimed to determine outcomes after PC and to define surgical strategy.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PC between 2009 and 2014 for ACC in a single institution were reviewed for outcomes and postdrainage management.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent PC with a median age of 77 years. Twenty patients (45%) presented American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 3-4, and all had cholecystitis grade II or III. The 6-month mortality was 17% (7/41 patients). Twelve patients (29%) presented PC-related complications. Catheters were removed, clamped, left open, and dislodged for 17, 9, 5, and 5 patients, respectively. Three patients died after PC, and data were missing for 2 patients. Twenty-five (61%) patients underwent cholecystectomy after PC, and were significantly younger (median age, 70 vs. 83; P<0.010), and presented with higher ASA score (ASA: 3-4, 36% vs. 68%; P=0.041) and more grade III cholecystitis (16% vs. 44%; P=0.050). Among 16 patients who did not undergo cholecystectomy, none presented recurrent gallstone disease (median survival, 7 mo; range, 0 to 55).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of complications associated with the catheter is high. To prevent morbidity related to PC, we suggest removing the catheter when ACC is controlled.

摘要

背景

经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC)是高死亡风险患者急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)胆囊切除术的替代方案,但导管及患者管理仍不明确。本研究旨在确定PC术后结局并明确手术策略。

方法

回顾2009年至2014年在单一机构因ACC接受PC的所有患者的结局及引流后管理情况。

结果

41例患者接受了PC,中位年龄77岁。20例患者(45%)美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分为3 - 4分,且均为II级或III级胆囊炎。6个月死亡率为17%(7/41例患者)。12例患者(29%)出现PC相关并发症。导管拔除、夹闭、开放及脱出的患者分别为17、9、5和5例。3例患者PC术后死亡,2例患者数据缺失。25例(61%)患者PC术后接受了胆囊切除术,且明显更年轻(中位年龄,70岁对83岁;P<0.010),ASA评分更高(ASA:3 - 4分,36%对68%;P = 0.041),III级胆囊炎更多(16%对44%;P = 0.050)。16例未接受胆囊切除术的患者中,无一例出现复发性胆结石疾病(中位生存期,7个月;范围,0至55个月)。

结论

导管相关并发症风险高。为预防与PC相关的发病情况,我们建议在ACC得到控制时拔除导管。

相似文献

1
Management After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: What Should We do With the Catheter?经皮胆囊造瘘术后的管理:我们该如何处理导管?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Aug;28(4):256-260. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000559.
2
Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery.高危急性胆囊炎患者保守性经皮胆囊造瘘术的结局及导致手术的危险因素
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2359-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3961-4. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
3
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis in the era of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.在早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术时代,经皮胆囊造瘘术治疗急性胆囊炎。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Oct;23(5):474-80. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318290142d.
4
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
5
Perioperative outcomes of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis with and without percutaneous cholecystostomy.有或无经皮胆囊造瘘术的急性结石性胆囊炎延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期结局
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):728-35. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
6
Cholecystectomy or not after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients.高危患者经皮胆囊造瘘术后是否行胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1497-502.
7
Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis.经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3642-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1771-5. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊穿刺引流术治疗高危患者急性胆囊炎(CHOCOLATE):多中心随机临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965.
9
Percutaneous cholecystostomy: single centre experience in 111 patients with an acute cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术:111例急性胆囊炎患者的单中心经验
JBR-BTR. 2014 Jul-Aug;97(4):197-201. doi: 10.5334/jbr-btr.101.
10
Management algorithm of acute cholecystitis after percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter placement based on outcomes from 377 patients.基于 377 例患者的结果制定经皮胆囊穿刺置管引流术后急性胆囊炎的管理算法。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Apr;45(4):1193-1197. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02449-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous cholecystostomy - An option in selected patients with acute cholecystitis.经皮胆囊造瘘术——特定急性胆囊炎患者的一种选择。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20101. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020101.