• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑行风险降低或对侧预防性乳房切除术的女性心理评估模板的制定:一项全国性 Delphi 共识研究。

The development of a template for psychological assessment of women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A national Delphi consensus study.

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Psycho-oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2349-2356. doi: 10.1002/pon.4830. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/pon.4830
PMID:29966172
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM) are increasingly prevalent strategies to reduce breast cancer risk. Given the associated physical and emotional challenges, presurgical psychological assessment is frequently recommended for this population, yet limited research exists to guide this. This study aimed to reach a consensus on the most relevant content and format of a psychological consultation prior to RRM/CPM.

METHODS

A modified two-round online Delphi study was conducted Australia-wide. Expert participants (n = 25), including psychologists, surgeons, nurses, oncologists, genetic specialists, and researchers completed a round-one survey, informed by a literature review, previous qualitative study and expert clinicians' input. This required participants to rate their agreement with 36 statements regarding potential content of a psychological consultation and provide feedback on format/structure. A round-two survey comprised items that had not reached consensus and six new items suggested by participants. Parameters for statement consensus were set a priori at >75% agreement.

RESULTS

Expert participants indicated agreement with the majority of statements (39/42, 92.8%), endorsing that the assessment should include (1) patient understanding of the RRM/CPM procedure/cancer risk, (2) potential physical/emotional impact of surgery, (3) informed decision-making, and (4) past/current psychological issues (anxiety and body image). A provisional assessment template and user manual is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This research culminated in a consensus-based template to guide psychological assessment of women considering RRM/CPM. This enables health professionals to assess suitability for surgery and preempt challenges within a standardised framework. Future evaluation of the acceptability and effectiveness of the template in clinical settings is warranted.

摘要

目的

降低风险的乳房切除术(RRM)和对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)是越来越流行的降低乳腺癌风险的策略。鉴于其相关的身体和情感挑战,该人群通常需要进行术前心理评估,但指导这种评估的研究有限。本研究旨在就 RRM/CPM 术前心理咨询的最相关内容和形式达成共识。

方法

在澳大利亚进行了一项改良的两轮在线德尔菲研究。包括心理学家、外科医生、护士、肿瘤学家、遗传专家和研究人员在内的 25 名专家参与者完成了一轮调查,该调查基于文献回顾、先前的定性研究和专家临床医生的意见。这要求参与者对 36 条关于心理咨询潜在内容的陈述进行评估,并就格式/结构提供反馈。第二轮调查包括未达成共识的项目和参与者提出的六个新项目。陈述一致性的参数在预先设定为>75%的一致性。

结果

专家参与者对大多数陈述(39/42,92.8%)表示同意,即评估应包括(1)患者对 RRM/CPM 程序/癌症风险的理解,(2)手术的潜在身体/情绪影响,(3)知情决策,以及(4)过去/当前的心理问题(焦虑和身体形象)。提供了一个临时评估模板和用户手册。

结论

这项研究最终达成了一个基于共识的模板,以指导考虑 RRM/CPM 的女性的心理评估。这使卫生专业人员能够在标准化框架内评估手术的适宜性并预测挑战。未来有必要在临床环境中评估该模板的可接受性和有效性。

相似文献

1
The development of a template for psychological assessment of women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: A national Delphi consensus study.考虑行风险降低或对侧预防性乳房切除术的女性心理评估模板的制定:一项全国性 Delphi 共识研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Oct;27(10):2349-2356. doi: 10.1002/pon.4830. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
An exploration of Australian psychologists' role in assessing women considering risk-reducing or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.对澳大利亚心理学家在评估考虑进行降低风险或对侧预防性乳房切除术的女性时所扮演角色的探索。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
3
Indications for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Consensus Statement Using Modified Delphi Methodology.对侧预防性乳房切除术的适应证:使用改良 Delphi 方法的共识声明。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):271-279. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002309.
4
Women's preferences for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy following unilateral breast cancer: What risk-reduction makes it worthwhile?单侧乳腺癌患者对双侧预防性乳房切除术的偏好:何种风险降低程度使其值得进行?
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.025. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Development and pilot testing of a Decision Aid (DA) for women with early-stage breast cancer considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.早期乳腺癌女性考虑行对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策辅助工具(DA)的开发和初步测试。
Breast. 2018 Aug;40:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies.对侧预防性乳房切除术女性的遗憾问题。
Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Sep;6(6):546-52. doi: 10.1007/s10434-999-0542-1.
7
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): A systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction.对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM):对患者报告的影响选择和满意度的因素及心理预测指标的系统评价
Breast. 2016 Aug;28:107-20. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
8
Psychological factors associated with the intention to choose for risk-reducing mastectomy in family cancer clinic attendees.与家庭癌症诊所就诊者选择降低风险乳房切除术意愿相关的心理因素。
Breast. 2016 Dec;30:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
9
"It felt like unfinished business, it feels like that's finished now": Women's experiences of decision making around contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).“感觉就像未竟之事,现在感觉已经结束了”:女性在决定是否进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)时的体验。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jun;28(6):1328-1334. doi: 10.1002/pon.5086. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Long-Term Satisfaction and Body Image After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术后的长期满意度和身体形象
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1499-1506. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5753-7. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.