• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血世界神经外科联合会(WFNS)分级为I级患者的不良预后

Unfavorable Outcome in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage WFNS Grade I.

作者信息

Zijlmans Jendé L, Coert Bert A, van den Berg René, Sprengers Marieke E S, Majoie Charles B L M, Vandertop W Peter, Verbaan Dagmar

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Neuroradiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e217-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.157. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.157
PMID:29966780
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade I on admission are generally considered to have a good clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the actual clinical outcome of WFNS grade I aSAH patients, and to determine which factors are associated with unfavourable outcome.

METHODS

For this prospective cohort study, 132 consecutive patients (age 18 years or older) with a WFNS grade I aSAH admitted to our hospital between December 2011 and January 2016 were eligible. Clinical outcome was measured using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6-month follow-up. Unfavorable outcome was defined as an mRS score of 3-6. Univariable analyses were performed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients, only 5 patients (4%) had an mRS score of 0 and most (65%) had an mRS score of 2. Twenty-five patients (22%) had an unfavorable outcome. Nine (8%) patients died, of whom 4 died during admission. Factors associated with unfavorable outcome were age (per increasing decade: odds ratio [OR]. 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.72), delayed cerebral ischemia (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.63-11.44), pneumonia (OR, 10.75; 95% CI, 1.94-59.46) and meningitis (OR, 28.47; 95% CI, 1.42-571.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their neurologically optimal clinical condition on admission, 1 in 5 patients with WFNS grade I aSAH has an unfavorable clinical outcome or is dead at 6-month follow-up. Additional multivariable analysis in larger patient cohorts is necessary to identify the extent to which preventable complications contribute to unfavorable outcomes in these patients.

摘要

背景

入院时为动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)且世界神经外科协会联盟(WFNS)分级为I级的患者通常被认为临床预后良好。

目的

本研究的目的是评估WFNS I级aSAH患者的实际临床预后,并确定哪些因素与不良预后相关。

方法

对于这项前瞻性队列研究,选取2011年12月至2016年1月期间连续入住我院的132例(年龄18岁及以上)WFNS I级aSAH患者作为研究对象。在6个月随访时使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估临床预后。不良预后定义为mRS评分为3 - 6分。使用逻辑回归模型进行单变量分析。

结果

116例患者中,仅有5例(4%)mRS评分为0,大多数(65%)mRS评分为2。25例(22%)患者预后不良。9例(8%)患者死亡,其中4例在住院期间死亡。与不良预后相关的因素包括年龄(每增加十岁:比值比[OR] 1.78;95%置信区间[CI],1.16 - 2.72)、迟发性脑缺血(OR,4.32;95% CI,1.63 - 11.44)、肺炎(OR,10.75;95% CI,1.94 - 59.46)和脑膜炎(OR,28.47;95% CI,1.42 - 571.15)。

结论

尽管入院时神经功能状态最佳,但五分之一的WFNS I级aSAH患者在6个月随访时预后不良或死亡。需要在更大的患者队列中进行额外的多变量分析,以确定可预防并发症在这些患者不良预后中所起作用的程度。

相似文献

1
Unfavorable Outcome in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage WFNS Grade I.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血世界神经外科联合会(WFNS)分级为I级患者的不良预后
World Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;118:e217-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.157. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Preoperative and postoperative predictors of long-term outcome after endovascular treatment of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.血管内治疗差分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的长期预后的术前和术后预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;126(6):1764-1771. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.JNS152587. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
3
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor for unfavorable functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可作为动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不良功能结局的独立预测因子。
J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 1;132(2):400-407. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.JNS181975. Print 2020 Feb 1.
4
Predictors of excellent functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血功能预后良好的预测因素。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;122(2):414-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14290. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
5
Aneurysm rebleeding after poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: Predictors and impact on clinical outcomes.低级别动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后的动脉瘤再出血:预测因素及其对临床结局的影响。
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Dec 15;371:62-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
6
Reconsidering the logic of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grading in patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage.重新审视世界神经外科协会联盟对严重蛛网膜下腔出血患者的分级逻辑。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Feb;124(2):299-304. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS14614. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
7
Prediction of outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: timing of clinical assessment.蛛网膜下腔出血预后预测:临床评估时机。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):52-59. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152136. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
[Use of somatosensory evoked potentials for preoperative assessment in patients with severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage before surgical or interventional treatment: a prospective observational cohort study].[体感诱发电位在严重动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者手术或介入治疗前的术前评估中的应用:一项前瞻性观察队列研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Mar;30(3):251-256. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.03.012.
9
Impact of early-onset seizures on grading and outcome in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.早发性癫痫对蛛网膜下腔出血患者分级及预后的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;122(2):408-13. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14163. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
Neuroglobin as a Novel Biomarker for Predicting Poor Outcomes in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.神经球蛋白作为预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血不良预后的新型生物标志物。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e258-e265. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.184. Epub 2018 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-class subarachnoid hemorrhage severity prediction: addressing challenges in predicting rare outcomes.多类别蛛网膜下腔出血严重程度预测:应对罕见结局预测中的挑战。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 10;48(1):554. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03678-9.
2
Impact of age on surgical outcomes for world federation of neurosurgical societies grade I and II aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a novel prognostic model using recursive partitioning analysis.年龄对世界神经外科学会分级 I 和 II 级颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血手术结果的影响:使用递归分区分析的新预后模型。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 30;47(1):829. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03067-8.
3
Hounsfield unit as a predictor of symptomatic vasospasm and hydrocephalus in good-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with endovascular coiling.
亨斯菲尔德单位作为血管内栓塞治疗的良好分级蛛网膜下腔出血患者症状性血管痉挛和脑积水的预测指标。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Oct 1;13(10):6627-6635. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-355. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
4
The value of comorbidities and illness severity scores as prognostic tools for early outcome estimation in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.合并症和疾病严重程度评分作为预测工具对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者早期预后的评估价值。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Dec;45(6):3829-3838. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01890-5. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
An accurate prognostic prediction for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage dedicated to patients after endovascular treatment.一种专门针对血管内治疗后患者的动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的准确预后预测。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2022 Jun 1;15:17562864221099473. doi: 10.1177/17562864221099473. eCollection 2022.
6
Neurosurgical Admission Later Than 4 h After the Emergency Call Does Not Result in Worse Long-Term Outcome in Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.急诊呼叫后4小时以上的神经外科入院并不会导致蛛网膜下腔出血患者更差的长期预后。
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 28;12:739020. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.739020. eCollection 2021.
7
Role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage in mice.内皮型一氧化氮合酶在小鼠蛛网膜下腔出血后早期脑损伤中的作用。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Jul;41(7):1669-1681. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20973787. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
8
[Long-term clinical outcomes of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Yunnan Province].[云南省动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的长期临床结局]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2020 Sep 30;40(9):1353-1358. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.09.20.
9
Early stage neuroglobin level as a predictor of delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.早期神经球蛋白水平作为预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者迟发性脑缺血的指标。
Brain Behav. 2020 Mar;10(3):e01547. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1547. Epub 2020 Feb 5.