Suppr超能文献

感染严重程度对血管腔内治疗后伴有组织缺损的严重肢体缺血临床结局的影响。

Impact of infection severity on clinical outcomes in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss after endovascular treatment.

作者信息

Makino Kenji, Hirano Keisuke, Kobayashi Norihiro, Yamawaki Masahiro, Araki Motoharu, Sakamoto Yasunari, Shinsuke Mori, Ito Yoshiaki

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, 3-6-1 Shimosueyoshi Tsurumi-ku Yokohama, Kanagawa, 230-8765, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2019 Jan;34(1):84-94. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1216-3. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Abstract

Critical limb ischemia with infected wounds is known to have a poor prognosis and evaluation of infection severity using the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system has been recommended. However, little is known about how infection severity influences the clinical outcomes of critical limb ischemia in patients with tissue loss. We investigated the impact of infection severity on the clinical outcomes in critical limb ischemia with tissue loss after endovascular treatment. In April 2007-August 2014, we enrolled 263 patients (328 limbs) who received endovascular treatment for critical limb ischemia with tissue loss. In the limbs examined, 369 individual wounds existed. We evaluated wound infection using the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) classification. We also investigated wound healing rates at 12 months and limb salvage and major amputation-free survival rates at 2 years after endovascular treatment. Wound healing rates at 12 months for class 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 89, 81, 58, and 33%, respectively (log rank P < 0.001). Limb salvage and major amputation-free survival rates at 2 years were lower in patients with lower vs. higher IDSA classes (classes 0-3: limb salvage rate: 97, 90, 61, and 0%, respectively; P < 0.001; major amputation-free survival: 67, 61, 38, and 0%, respectively; P < 0.001). In Rutherford category 5, only wound healing rates at 12 months and limb salvage and major amputation-free survival rates at 2 years were stratified according to wound infection severity (wound healing rates: 87% in classes 0 and 1 and 65% in classes 2 and 3; P < 0.001; limb salvage rates: 93% in classes 0 and 1 and 69% in classes 0 and 2; P < 0.0001; major amputation-free survival rates: 61% in classes 0 and 1 and 46% in classes 2 and 3; P < 0.001). Wound infection severity affects clinical outcomes of critical limb ischemia with tissue loss, especially in critical limb ischemia with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In Rutherford category 5, only clinical outcomes of critical limb ischemia were well-stratified according to infection severity. Wound infection affects clinical outcomes of patients with critical limb ischemia with tissue loss.

摘要

已知伴有感染伤口的严重肢体缺血预后较差,因此推荐使用伤口、缺血和足部感染分类系统来评估感染严重程度。然而,对于感染严重程度如何影响组织缺损患者严重肢体缺血的临床结局,人们了解甚少。我们研究了感染严重程度对血管内治疗后组织缺损的严重肢体缺血患者临床结局的影响。2007年4月至2014年8月,我们纳入了263例(328条肢体)因组织缺损的严重肢体缺血接受血管内治疗的患者。在所检查的肢体中,存在369处个体伤口。我们使用美国传染病学会(IDSA)分类评估伤口感染情况。我们还调查了血管内治疗后12个月时的伤口愈合率以及2年时的肢体挽救率和无大截肢生存率。0、1、2和3级伤口在12个月时的愈合率分别为89%、81%、58%和33%(对数秩检验P<0.001)。IDSA分级较低的患者与分级较高的患者相比,2年时的肢体挽救率和无大截肢生存率较低(0-3级:肢体挽救率分别为97%、90%、61%和0%;P<0.001;无大截肢生存率分别为67%、61%、38%和0%;P<0.001)。在卢瑟福5级中,仅根据伤口感染严重程度对12个月时的伤口愈合率以及2年时的肢体挽救率和无大截肢生存率进行分层(伤口愈合率:0级和1级为87%,2级和3级为65%;P<   0.001;肢体挽救率:0级和1级为93%,2级和3级为69%;P<0.0001;无大截肢生存率:0级和1级为61%,2级和3级为46%;P<0.001)。伤口感染严重程度会影响伴有组织缺损的严重肢体缺血的临床结局,尤其是在伴有全身炎症反应综合征的严重肢体缺血中。在卢瑟福5级中,仅严重肢体缺血的临床结局根据感染严重程度进行了良好分层。伤口感染会影响伴有组织缺损的严重肢体缺血患者的临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验