Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性、随机、III 期研究,旨在评估纤维蛋白胶 Grifols 作为肝切除术止血辅助手段与纤维素片相比的疗效和安全性。

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fibrin Sealant Grifols as an Adjunct to Hemostasis as Compared to Cellulose Sheets in Hepatic Surgery Resections.

机构信息

Department for Minimally Invasive Upper Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Hospital for Digestive Surgery - First Surgical Hospital, Dr Koste Todorovica Street No 66, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia.

Bioscience Research Group, Grifols, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):1939-1949. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3852-4. Epub 2018 Jul 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local hemostatic agents have a role in limiting bleeding complications associated with liver resection.

METHODS

In this randomized, phase III study, we compared the efficacy and safety of Fibrin Sealant Grifols (FS Grifols) with oxidized cellulose sheets (Surgicel®) as adjuncts to hemostasis during hepatic resections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at target bleeding sites (TBS) within 4 min (T) of treatment application. Secondary efficacy variables were time to hemostasis (TTH) at a later time point if re-bleeding occurs and cumulative proportion of patients achieving hemostasis by time points T, T, T, T, and T.

RESULTS

The rate of hemostasis by T was 92.8% in the FS Grifols group (n = 163) and 80.5% in the Surgicel® group (n = 162) (p = 0.01). The mean TTH was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the FS Grifols group (2.8 ± 0.14 vs. 3.8 ± 0.24 min). The rate of hemostasis by T, T, and T was higher and statistically superior in the FS Grifols group compared to Surgicel®. No substantial differences in adverse events (AE) were noted between treatment groups. The most common AEs were procedural pain (36.2 vs. 37.7%), nausea (20.9 vs. 23.5%), and hypotension (14.1 vs 6.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

FS Grifols was safe and well tolerated as a local hemostatic agent during liver resection surgeries. Overall, data demonstrate that the hemostatic efficacy of FS Grifols is superior to Surgicel® and support the use of FS Grifols as an effective local hemostatic agent in these surgical procedures.

摘要

背景

局部止血剂在限制肝切除相关出血并发症方面具有作用。

方法

在这项随机、III 期研究中,我们比较了纤维蛋白密封剂 Grifols(FS Grifols)与氧化纤维素片(Surgicel®)作为肝切除术中辅助止血的疗效和安全性。主要疗效终点是在治疗后 4 分钟(T)内达到目标出血部位(TBS)止血的患者比例(T)。次要疗效变量是如果发生再出血,在稍后时间点达到止血的时间(TTH)和按时间点 T、T、T、T 和 T 达到止血的患者累计比例。

结果

FS Grifols 组(n=163)止血率为 92.8%,Surgicel®组(n=162)为 80.5%(p=0.01)。FS Grifols 组的平均 TTH 明显缩短(p<0.001)(2.8±0.14 分钟比 3.8±0.24 分钟)。FS Grifols 组在 T、T 和 T 时的止血率更高,且明显优于 Surgicel®组。两组间不良事件(AE)发生率无显著差异。最常见的 AE 为程序性疼痛(36.2%比 37.7%)、恶心(20.9%比 23.5%)和低血压(14.1%比 6.2%)。

结论

FS Grifols 作为肝切除手术中的局部止血剂是安全且耐受良好的。总体而言,数据表明 FS Grifols 的止血效果优于 Surgicel®,支持在这些手术中使用 FS Grifols 作为有效的局部止血剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验