Liu Tie, Sun Junxi, Wang Haixia, Wang Xinwei, Zheng Sheng, Guo Peng
Department of Anus and Intestine Surgery, Weifang Municipal People's Hospital, Shandong Weifang 261041, China.
Outpatient Office, Weifang Municipal People's Hospital, Shandong Weifang 261041, China.
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 25;21(6):685-690.
To explore the effect of continuous negative pressure drainage with intermittent irrigation on surgical site infection (SSI) after laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excison (ELAPE).
Clinical data of 28 rectal cancer patients who underwent continuous negative pressure drainage with intermittent irrigation following laparoscopic ELAPE (negative irrigation group) at our department from March 2016 to August 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. At the same time, 32 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic ELAPE and simple presacral drainage from January 2014 to February 2016 were included as controls (simple drainage group). Self-made double cannula: one silicon rubber drainage tube was used; 3 side holes were cut at the front end with 1-2 cm interval; tube was ranked intermittently and oppositely; a small hole was cut in the middle of rear; the infusion tube was placed through the small hole to the front side of the drainage tube (to rinse when the drainage was turbid). The placement and use of self-made double cannula: it was placed in the presacral space and was drawn from the medial to the sciatic tubercle, then was connected to drainage bag for 24 hours; when no blood was observed, the drainage tube was connected to negative pressure drainage ball, keeping negative pressure status. The development of SSI within 30 days postoperatively and other perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups.
There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between two groups (all P>0.05). Incidence of SSI in negative irrigation group was significantly lower than that in simple drainage group [14.3% (4/28) vs. 43.8% (14/32), χ=6.173, P=0.013]. Additionally, a shorter postoperative hospital stay was observed in negative irrigation group [(9.8±1.5) days vs. (11.4±2.6) days, t=2.918, P=0.005]. Besides, other perioperative parameters, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to removal of drainage tube, etc were not significantly different between two groups (all P>0.05). After adjusting to confounders, multivariate analysis showed that negative pressure drainage was an independent protective factor for SSI following laparoscopic ELAPE (OR=0.214, 95%CI:0.060-0.762, P=0.002).
Continuous negative pressure drainage with intermittent irrigation can effectively decrease the incidence of SSI following laparoscopic ELAPE, and is safe and simple.
探讨持续负压引流联合间歇性冲洗对腹腔镜经腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术(ELAPE)术后手术部位感染(SSI)的影响。
回顾性分析2016年3月至2017年8月在我科接受腹腔镜ELAPE术后持续负压引流联合间歇性冲洗的28例直肠癌患者的临床资料(负压冲洗组)。同时,纳入2014年1月至2016年2月接受腹腔镜ELAPE及单纯骶前引流的32例直肠癌患者作为对照组(单纯引流组)。自制双套管:采用一根硅胶引流管;在前端相距1-2 cm处开3个侧孔;引流管呈间断对侧排列;在后端中间开一个小孔;将输液管从小孔置入引流管前方(引流液浑浊时进行冲洗)。自制双套管的放置与使用:置于骶前间隙,从内侧向坐骨结节引出,连接引流袋24小时;无血性引流液时,将引流管连接负压引流球,保持负压状态。比较两组术后30天内SSI的发生情况及其他围手术期参数。
两组基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。负压冲洗组SSI发生率显著低于单纯引流组[14.3%(4/28)比43.8%(14/32),χ=6.173,P=0.013]。此外,负压冲洗组术后住院时间较短[(9.8±1.5)天比(11.4±2.6)天,t=2.918,P=0.005]。此外,两组其他围手术期参数,包括手术时间、术中出血量、引流管拔除时间等比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。校正混杂因素后,多因素分析显示负压引流是腹腔镜ELAPE术后SSI的独立保护因素(OR=0.214,95%CI:0.060-0.762,P=0.002)。
持续负压引流联合间歇性冲洗可有效降低腹腔镜ELAPE术后SSI的发生率,且安全简便。