Arief Muzawir, Kinnunen Ulla-Mari, Saranto Kaija
University of Eastern Finland, Department of Health and Social Management, Finland.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:229-232.
The study aimed to identify websites with dementia-related content and evaluate their readability and accessibility. A purposeful sample of 300 websites, which provided information on dementia, were identified from searches using the Google, Yahoo and Bing search engines. Two generic evaluation tools based on WCAG2.0 were used to assess the accessibility of information on dementia and two readability tests (Flesh-Kincaid Grade level and SMOG) were used to evaluate the websites. Only 94 websites have a HON certificate (31.3%), while 38 of the finally selected websites have an average of 56.89 and 32 problems in relation to the Axe and Achecker tools respectively. The most common problems (for images on 19 and 17 of the websites respectively) were related to text resize and the lack of text explanation, and an insufficient color contrast was found on 35 websites. The readability score was 8.2 (FKG) and 7.4 (SMOG) on average, which meant that the sites in question were not recommendable for the general population.
该研究旨在识别包含痴呆症相关内容的网站,并评估其可读性和可访问性。通过使用谷歌、雅虎和必应搜索引擎进行搜索,从提供痴呆症信息的网站中选取了300个网站作为有目的的样本。使用了两种基于WCAG2.0的通用评估工具来评估痴呆症信息的可访问性,并使用两种可读性测试(弗莱什-金凯德年级水平和烟雾测试)来评估这些网站。只有94个网站拥有健康在线网络(HON)证书(31.3%),而最终选定的网站中,分别有38个网站在Axe和Achecker工具方面平均存在56.89个和32个问题。最常见的问题(分别在19个和17个网站的图像上出现)与文本大小调整和缺乏文本解释有关,并且在35个网站上发现颜色对比度不足。平均可读性得分分别为8.2(弗莱什-金凯德年级水平)和7.4(烟雾测试),这意味着这些网站不适合普通人群。