Department of Integrative Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Nov;14(6):692-702. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4083. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
Declining bird populations across the United States have been noted in a number of studies. Although multiple explanations have been proposed as causes of these declines, agricultural intensification has often been suggested as a significant driver of bird population dynamics. Using spatially explicit USDA-NASS Cropland Data Layer, we examined this relationship by comparing bird count data from the Breeding Bird Survey collected between 1995 and 2016 across 13 states in the central United States to corresponding categorical changes in land cover within a 2-km radius of each survey transect. This approach allowed us to compare the slopes of counts for 31 species of birds between grassland- and cropland-dominated landscapes and against increasing levels of cropland (all types combined) and pooled corn and soybean land cover types. Nearly all birds demonstrated significant responses to land cover changes. In all cases, the number of species exhibiting positive or negative responses was comparable, and median differences in percent change per year ranged from -0.5 to 0.7%. Species that responded either positively or negatively did not appear to fall into any particular foraging guild. If changes in agricultural practices are a major cause of declines, we would expect to see it across the spatial scale studied and across the majority of species. While these results do not rule out potential agricultural effects, such as toxicity resulting from pesticide exposure, which may have species-specific or localized effects, a variety of factors related to habitat are likely the most significant contributor overall. Given these results over a large spatial scale basis (multistate) and across numerous bird species, there is not a broad general trend of greater decline in crop-intensive areas. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2018;14:692-702. © 2018 SETAC.
美国多项研究都注意到鸟类数量下降的情况。尽管有多种解释被提出作为这些下降的原因,但农业集约化经常被认为是鸟类种群动态的重要驱动因素。我们使用 USDA-NASS 耕地数据层,通过比较 1995 年至 2016 年间在美国中部 13 个州收集的繁殖鸟类调查中的鸟类计数数据,以及每个调查样线 2 公里半径内土地覆盖的相应类别变化,来研究这种关系。这种方法使我们能够比较 31 种鸟类在草原和耕地为主的景观之间的计数斜率,以及与耕地(所有类型)和玉米和大豆混合耕地类型增加水平相对应的计数斜率。几乎所有鸟类都对土地覆盖变化表现出显著的反应。在所有情况下,表现出正或负反应的物种数量相当,每年变化百分比的中位数差异范围从-0.5%到 0.7%。表现出正或负反应的物种似乎不属于任何特定的觅食群体。如果农业实践的变化是下降的主要原因,我们预计在研究的空间尺度上和大多数物种中都会看到这种情况。虽然这些结果不能排除潜在的农业影响,例如农药暴露导致的毒性,这可能具有物种特异性或局部影响,但与栖息地相关的各种因素可能是最重要的总体贡献者。考虑到这些在大空间尺度(多州)和大量鸟类物种上的结果,在集约农业地区并没有更广泛的普遍下降趋势。综合环境评估与管理 2018;14:692-702。2018 年 SETAC 版权所有。