1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.
2 Department of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Science and Engineering, West Texas A&M University, Canyon, Texas 79016, USA.
J Food Prot. 2018 Aug;81(8):1236-1244. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-497.
Dehiding during beef cattle processing can introduce fecal contaminants, including Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), from hides onto carcass surfaces, creating the potential for contaminated beef. Fecal shedding of major STEC serogroups (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145, and O157; STEC-7) may differ among cattle populations, yet no study has been conducted to isolate STEC-7 on hides of multiple cattle types on the same production days at the same processing plant. Our objective was to estimate and compare prevalence and concentrations of STEC-7 on hides of cull dairy, cull beef, and fed beef cattle from the same date and processing plant. Overall, 1,500 cattle hides were sponge sampled from cull dairy ( n = 500), cull beef ( n = 500) and fed beef cattle ( n = 500) over 10 processing days. To determine prevalence, samples were subjected to an immunomagnetic separation culture method, and presumptive STEC isolates were tested by PCR for serogroup and major virulence genes. A spiral plate method was used to enumerate STEC-7 from hide samples. Data were analyzed with linear mixed models. All STEC-7 serogroups except O121 were detected and quantified on cattle hides in this study population. Slightly more fed beef hides (77 of 500; 15.4%) and cull beef hides (76 of 500; 15.2%) were positive for at least one STEC-7 strain compared with cull dairy hides (57 of 500; 11.4%), but cattle type was not significantly associated ( P = 0.19) with STEC-7 prevalence. Fed beef hides had a significantly higher prevalence ( P < 0.05) of STEC O103, O145, and O157 serogroups than did either of the other cattle types. The highest proportions of quantifiable samples were for STEC O145 (32 of 1,500 samples; 2.1%) and O157 (31 of 1,500 samples; 2.1%) serogroups, with the majority of concentrations at 3 to 5 and 2 to 4 log CFU/100 cm of hide, respectively. Results indicate that hide contamination with some major STEC serogroups differs significantly among cattle types at harvest, even within the same day and location.
宰前去势过程中,牛皮上的粪便污染物,包括产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC),可能会转移到胴体表面,从而导致牛肉污染。然而,目前还没有研究在同一加工厂的同一天对来自不同牛群的多种类型的牛皮上分离 STEC-7。我们的目的是评估和比较来自同一日期和同一加工厂的淘汰奶牛、淘汰肉牛和育肥牛的牛皮上 STEC-7 的流行率和浓度。总体而言,在 10 个加工日期间,从淘汰奶牛(n=500)、淘汰肉牛(n=500)和育肥牛(n=500)中采集了 1500 张牛皮进行海绵采样。为了确定流行率,将样品进行免疫磁分离培养方法处理,并通过 PCR 对疑似 STEC 分离株进行血清群和主要毒力基因检测。使用螺旋板法从牛皮样品中计数 STEC-7。采用线性混合模型进行数据分析。在本研究人群中,除 O121 外,所有 STEC-7 血清群均在牛的牛皮上被检测和定量。与淘汰奶牛皮(57 张中的 500 张;11.4%)相比,略多的育肥牛皮(77 张中的 500 张;15.4%)和淘汰肉牛皮(76 张中的 500 张;15.2%)至少有一株 STEC-7 阳性,但牛种与 STEC-7 流行率之间无显著相关性(P=0.19)。育肥牛皮的 STEC O103、O145 和 O157 血清群的流行率显著高于其他两种牛(P<0.05)。可定量样品的最高比例为 STEC O145(1500 个样品中的 32 个;2.1%)和 O157(1500 个样品中的 31 个;2.1%)血清群,其浓度主要在 3 至 5 和 2 至 4 对数 CFU/100cm 牛皮之间。结果表明,即使在同一天和同一地点,牛皮上某些主要 STEC 血清群的污染在收获时也因牛种不同而有显著差异。