Pors Anja Svejgaard
Department of Management and Administration, Copenhagen University College , Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Jun 18;32(4):603-617. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-10-2016-0193. Epub 2018 May 29.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the relational consequences of electronic patient records based on co-produced data from pregnant women's IT supported self-reporting. The analysis unfolds how the clinical encounter between patient and professional is reconfigured in the digitized society. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a grounded theory analysis based on observations and interviews in an antenatal care unit. The study draws on empirical material generated through observations of the clinical encounters between pregnant women and midwifes, interviews with managers and midwifes, field notes and policy documents. Findings The author argues that the use of technology and co-produced data displace tasks and relations between healthcare professional and patient. The analysis shows that four modes of organizational patient involvement are enacted: involvement in administrative tasks, involvement in professional resistance, individualized involvement, and homogenized involvement of patients that tends to categorize the pregnancy roughly as either "normal" or "abnormal." Originality/value This study contributes to qualitative research in digitization and patient involvement in health organization studies by showing how digital technology distributes the midwife's autonomy, tasks and knowledge about the patient with both intended and unintended consequences. The argument goes beyond the prevalent prescriptive approaches to e-government and co-production, instead providing a critical analytical perspective on the promises of delivering efficient and patient-centered healthcare.
目的 本文旨在基于孕妇信息技术支持的自我报告所产生的共同生成数据,研究电子病历的关系后果。该分析揭示了在数字化社会中患者与专业人员之间的临床互动是如何重新构建的。
设计/方法/途径 本文基于对一个产前护理单元的观察和访谈进行扎根理论分析。该研究借鉴了通过观察孕妇与助产士之间的临床互动、对管理人员和助产士的访谈、实地记录以及政策文件所产生的实证材料。
研究结果 作者认为技术的使用和共同生成的数据取代了医疗保健专业人员与患者之间的任务和关系。分析表明,出现了四种组织层面患者参与的模式:参与行政任务、参与专业抵制、个体化参与以及患者的同质化参与,这种参与往往将妊娠大致归类为“正常”或“异常”。
原创性/价值 本研究通过展示数字技术如何分配助产士关于患者的自主权、任务和知识,且产生了有意和无意的后果,为数字化和健康组织研究中患者参与的定性研究做出了贡献。该论点超越了电子政务和共同生产的普遍规范性方法,而是提供了一个关于提供高效且以患者为中心的医疗保健承诺的批判性分析视角。