• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物涂层球囊辅助治疗股总动脉疾病的血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive drug-coated balloon therapy in endovascular treatment of common femoral artery disease.

作者信息

Imran Hafiz M, Hyder Omar N, Soukas Peter A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital/Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital/Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Miriam Hospital/Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.018
PMID:29970328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical endarterectomy with or without patch angioplasty has been considered the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic common femoral artery (CFA) disease. Surgical risks include wound infection, hematoma and lymph leak in approximately 17% of patients. Endovascular therapy has less procedure-related morbidity and mortality. Endovascular approaches achieve patency rates of 60% to 90% at 1 and 2 years utilizing atherectomy and balloon angioplasty. CFA stenting has been limited due to concerns of stent kinking, thrombosis and restenosis. Combined directional atherectomy with drug-coated balloon to treat CFA disease in patients with Rutherford II/III patients has been studied recently. We sought to study the safety and outcomes of adjunct drug-coated balloon (DCB) therapy in symptomatic CFA disease patients, including critical limb ischemia (Rutherford IV), after achieving procedural success.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the additive efficacy of drug coated balloon in treating CFA disease.

METHODS

Using retrospective single center data, we analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent CFA interventions. In this non-randomized study, all patients from December 2010 to December 2014 with CFA disease underwent atherectomy (orbital, plaque excision or both) with adjunctive scoring balloon angioplasty (Ath/PTA). After December 2014, patients treated with combination atherectomy and DCB, (Ath/DCB), underwent final drug delivery to the vessel wall with drug-coated balloon. Distal embolic protection devices were used in the majority of patients. Primary efficacy endpoint was 1-year primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Patency of vessels was assessed at 12-month interval using duplex ultrasound.

RESULTS

Seventy de novo common femoral artery stenotic lesions were treated in both groups. Mean age was 69 in (Ath/PTA) group and 72 in Ath/DCB group. Patients in each group had similar risk factor profiles including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, prior coronary revascularization, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accidents and chronic kidney disease. The Ath/DCB group had more advanced disease presentation by Rutherford classification (intermittent claudication in 61% and critical limb ischemia in 39% versus intermittent claudication in 76% and chronic limb ischemia in 24%) when compared with the Ath/PTA group. Primary efficacy endpoint was met in 85% and 94% (p = 0.26) in the Ath/PTA and Ath/DCB groups respectively. All patients had run-off angiography at the end of procedure to ensure patency.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive drug-coated balloon therapy does not increase the primary patency rate when compared with atherectomy and scoring balloon angioplasty alone at 1-year in common femoral artery disease treatment.

摘要

背景

有或没有补片血管成形术的外科动脉内膜切除术一直被认为是治疗有症状的股总动脉(CFA)疾病的金标准。手术风险包括伤口感染、血肿和淋巴漏,约17%的患者会出现这些情况。血管内治疗的手术相关发病率和死亡率较低。血管内治疗方法在1年和2年时通过旋切术和球囊血管成形术实现的通畅率为60%至90%。由于担心支架扭结、血栓形成和再狭窄,CFA支架置入术受到限制。最近研究了联合定向旋切术与药物涂层球囊治疗卢瑟福II/III级患者的CFA疾病。我们试图研究在有症状的CFA疾病患者,包括严重肢体缺血(卢瑟福IV级)患者中,在手术成功后辅助使用药物涂层球囊(DCB)治疗的安全性和结果。

目的

评估药物涂层球囊治疗CFA疾病的附加疗效。

方法

利用回顾性单中心数据,我们分析了接受CFA干预的患者的结果。在这项非随机研究中,2010年12月至2014年12月所有患有CFA疾病的患者均接受了旋切术(眼眶、斑块切除术或两者兼有)并辅助使用刻痕球囊血管成形术(Ath/PTA)。2014年12月之后,接受旋切术和DCB联合治疗(Ath/DCB)的患者通过药物涂层球囊将最终药物输送至血管壁。大多数患者使用了远端栓塞保护装置。主要疗效终点为1年的主要通畅率和免于临床驱动的靶病变血管重建(CD-TLR)。使用双功超声每隔12个月评估血管通畅情况。

结果

两组共治疗了70处新发的股总动脉狭窄病变。Ath/PTA组的平均年龄为69岁,Ath/DCB组为72岁。每组患者的危险因素特征相似,包括糖尿病、高血压、吸烟、冠状动脉疾病、心肌梗死、既往冠状动脉血运重建、充血性心力衰竭、脑血管意外和慢性肾病。与Ath/PTA组相比,Ath/DCB组根据卢瑟福分类法疾病表现更严重(间歇性跛行为61%,严重肢体缺血为39%,而间歇性跛行为76%,慢性肢体缺血为24%)。Ath/PTA组和Ath/DCB组分别有85%和94%达到主要疗效终点(p = 0.26)。所有患者在手术结束时均进行了流出道血管造影以确保通畅。

结论

在股总动脉疾病治疗中,与单独的旋切术和刻痕球囊血管成形术相比,1年时辅助药物涂层球囊治疗不会提高主要通畅率。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of adjunctive drug-coated balloon therapy in endovascular treatment of common femoral artery disease.药物涂层球囊辅助治疗股总动脉疾病的血管内治疗的疗效和安全性。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Mar;20(3):210-214. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
2
Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs. Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Endovascular Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与传统球囊血管成形术治疗股总动脉粥样硬化性疾病的血管内治疗结果比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Jul;21(7):867-874. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.11.008. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
3
Mid-term outcomes of orbital atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon angioplasty for treatment of femoropopliteal disease.轨道斑块旋切术联合药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗股腘动脉疾病的中期结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;89(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26984. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Common Femoral Artery Atherosclerotic Disease.药物涂层球囊血管成形术与定向斑块切除术联合抗再狭窄治疗在股总动脉粥样硬化疾病中的应用。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Feb;25(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/1526602817748319. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
One-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Legflow Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusions Registry.Legflow 药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉闭塞症的一年临床结果登记研究。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1526602818823557.
6
Long-term outcomes with Jetstream atherectomy with or without drug coated balloons in treating femoropopliteal arteries: A single center experience (JET-SCE).使用Jetstream斑块旋切术联合或不联合药物涂层球囊治疗股腘动脉的长期疗效:单中心经验(JET-SCE)
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Oct;19(7 Pt A):771-777. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
Efficacy of Rotational Atherectomy Followed by Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions-Comparison with Sole Drug-coated Balloon Revascularization: Two-year Outcomes.药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗股腘病变的疗效-与单纯药物涂层球囊血管再通术的比较:两年结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:222-233. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.051. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort.药物涂层球囊血管成形术在真实世界股腘动脉队列中的三年持续临床疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931477. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy vs Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Isolated Popliteal Artery Lesions.抗再狭窄治疗的定向斑块旋切术与单纯药物涂层球囊血管成形术治疗孤立性腘动脉病变的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Apr;24(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1526602816683933. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Rotational atherectomy with adjunctive balloon angioplasty in calcified chronic total occlusions of superficial femoral artery.旋磨术联合球囊血管成形术治疗股浅动脉钙化性慢性完全闭塞病变
Vascular. 2021 Oct;29(5):682-692. doi: 10.1177/1708538120970817. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical, Endovascular, and Multimodal Approaches to the Management of Atherosclerotic Common Femoral Artery Disease.手术、血管内及多模式治疗方法用于管理动脉粥样硬化性股总动脉疾病
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2023 Jun 16;40(2):156-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-57262. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Open Surgical Thrombendarterectomy Versus Endovascular Treatment in Occlusive Processes of the Femoral Artery Bifurcation.开放手术血栓内膜切除术与腔内治疗股动脉分叉闭塞性病变的比较。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Nov 25;119(47):803-809. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0331.
3
Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Intervention and Endarterectomy in Patients with Femoral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
股动脉疾病患者血管内介入治疗与动脉内膜切除术的比较分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Hematol Rep. 2022 Jun 1;14(2):179-202. doi: 10.3390/hematolrep14020026.
4
Current developments in endovascular therapy of peripheral vascular disease.外周血管疾病血管内治疗的当前进展
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1681-1694. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.130.