European Vascular Centre Aachen-Maastricht, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Department of Vascular Surgery Marienhospital Witten, Witten, Germany.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;56(3):442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) of the groin remain a crucial problem in vascular surgery, prompting great interest in preventative techniques, such as closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). This prospective randomised study aimed to assess the potential benefits of ciNPT application after groin incisions for vascular surgery.
The study included 204 patients who underwent vascular surgery for peripheral artery disease (PAD) at two sites between July 2015 and May 2017. These patients received post-operative treatment with ciNPT (intervention group) or standard wound dressings (control group). After exclusion, 188 patients were assessed for SSIs using the Szilagyi classification.
The mean patient age was 66.6 ± 9.4 years (range 43-85 years), and 70% were male (n = 132). Regarding PAD stage, 52% were stage IIB, 28% stage III, and 19% stage IV. Among the patients, 45% (n = 85) had had a previous groin incision. Bacterial swabs were performed in each case of suspected SSI (22.8% [43/188]), while 76.7% (33/188) were negative, there were 5% [5/98] positive swabs in the intervention group and 5.5% [5/90] in the control group). Antibiotics were given to 13.2% of the intervention group, and 31.1% of the control group (p = .004). The control group experienced more frequent SSIs (33.3%; 30/90) than the intervention group (13.2%; 13/98; p = .0015; absolute risk difference -20.1 per 100; 95% CI -31.9 to 8.2). This difference was based on an increased rate of Szilagyi I SSI in the control group (24.6% vs. 8.1%, p = .0012).
The results confirmed a reduced superficial SSI rate after vascular surgical groin incision using ciNPT compared with standard wound dressings.
腹股沟区外科部位感染(SSI)仍然是血管外科的一个重要问题,这促使人们对预防技术产生了极大的兴趣,例如密闭切口负压治疗(ciNPT)。本前瞻性随机研究旨在评估腹股沟切口血管手术后应用 ciNPT 的潜在益处。
该研究纳入了 2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 5 月期间在两个部位接受血管外科治疗的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者 204 例。这些患者在术后接受 ciNPT(干预组)或标准伤口敷料(对照组)治疗。排除后,188 例患者采用 Szilagyi 分类法评估 SSI。
患者平均年龄为 66.6±9.4 岁(范围 43-85 岁),70%为男性(n=132)。关于 PAD 分期,2B 期占 52%,3 期占 28%,4 期占 19%。患者中 45%(n=85)有腹股沟区既往切口。对疑似 SSI 的每个病例进行细菌拭子检查(22.8%[188/825]),其中 76.7%(33/188)为阴性,干预组有 5%(5/98)阳性拭子,对照组有 5.5%(5/90)阳性拭子。干预组有 13.2%的患者使用抗生素,对照组有 31.1%(p=0.004)。对照组 SSI 发生率较高(33.3%[30/90]),干预组发生率较低(13.2%[13/98];p=0.0015;绝对风险差异为-20.1/100;95%CI-31.9 至 8.2)。这种差异基于对照组 Szilagyi I SSI 发生率的增加(24.6% vs. 8.1%,p=0.0012)。
与标准伤口敷料相比,血管外科腹股沟切口应用 ciNPT 可降低浅表性 SSI 发生率。