Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hopital Lariboisiere, Paris, France.
EA 7334 REMES, Université Paris, Paris, France.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec;10(12):1183-1186. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014016. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
To determine long term safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), with calibrated particle embolization as a firstline approach.
We reviewed clinical and imaging data of consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for both nidal and fistulous type spinal cord AVMs in our center, from 1990 to 2015. Outcome at the last follow-up was assessed by an independent observer.
Embolization of spinal cord AVMs was performed in 61 patients, including 46 (75%) with particles (exclusively in 29 patients), 30 (49%) with cyanoacrylate, and 6 (10%) with combined surgical treatments. Particle embolizations were iterative in 33 patients (median number of sessions 5 (range 3-6)). Neurological deterioration after treatment occurred in 5 patients (cyanoacrylate=4, surgery=1, particles=0; P<0.001). At a median follow-up of 6 years (range 3-13 years), angiographic cure was obtained in 11/61 (18%) patients (nidal type=6/53 (11%), fistulous type=5/8 (63%)). In progressive forms, neurological improvement occurred in 16/28 (57%) patients, stabilized in 9/28 (31%), and worsened in 3/28 (12%). In hemorrhagic forms, the rebleeding rate was 4/14 patient years without standard treatment, 0/322 patient years in partial iterative treatment, and 0/15 patient years in angiographically cured lesions (P=0.001).
Our study suggests that particle embolization as a firstline therapy to treat spinal cord AVMs is safe and offers long term efficacy, especially for those with small, distal, and multiple shunts. Partial occlusion of the AVM may be sufficient to prevent rebleeding, without the potential risks of complete occlusion. Particle calibration and injection technique, 'one by one', are critical to safety. Cyanoacrylate embolization or surgery remains necessary if particle embolization fails to occlude large shunts.
确定血管内治疗脊髓动静脉畸形(AVM)的长期安全性和有效性,以校准颗粒栓塞作为一线治疗方法。
我们回顾了 1990 年至 2015 年期间在我们中心接受血管内治疗的节段性和瘘型脊髓 AVM 连续患者的临床和影像学资料。最后一次随访时由独立观察者评估结局。
61 例患者接受了脊髓 AVM 栓塞治疗,其中 46 例(75%)采用颗粒(仅 29 例采用),30 例(49%)采用氰基丙烯酸酯,6 例(10%)采用联合手术治疗。33 例患者(中位栓塞次数 5 次(范围 3-6 次))进行了迭代栓塞。5 例患者(氰基丙烯酸酯=4 例,手术=1 例,颗粒=0 例)治疗后出现神经功能恶化(P<0.001)。中位随访 6 年(范围 3-13 年)后,11/61(18%)例患者(节段性=6/53(11%),瘘型=5/8(63%))获得血管造影治愈。在进展型中,16/28(57%)例患者出现神经功能改善,9/28(31%)例患者稳定,3/28(12%)例患者恶化。在出血型中,未经标准治疗的 14 患者年再出血率为 4/14,部分迭代治疗的 322 患者年再出血率为 0,血管造影治愈病变的 15 患者年再出血率为 0(P=0.001)。
我们的研究表明,颗粒栓塞作为治疗脊髓 AVM 的一线治疗方法是安全的,具有长期疗效,特别是对于小、远端和多分流的病变。AVM 的部分闭塞可能足以防止再出血,而不会有完全闭塞的潜在风险。颗粒校准和注射技术,“逐个”,对安全性至关重要。如果颗粒栓塞不能闭塞大分流,氰基丙烯酸酯栓塞或手术仍然是必要的。