• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种语音评估工具的效度和信度证据。

Evidence of validity and reliability of a phonological assessment tool.

作者信息

Ceron Marizete Ilha, Gubiani Marileda Barichello, Oliveira Camila Rosa de, Keske-Soares Márcia

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - UFSM - Santa Maria (RS), Brasil.

Faculdade Meridional - IMED - Passo Fundo (RS), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2018 Jul 2;30(3):e20170180. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017180.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20182017180
PMID:29972445
Abstract

PURPOSE

To present evidence of the validity and reliability of a phonological assessment tool developed to assess the phonological inventory of Brazilian Portuguese.

METHODS

The study included 866 children aged between 3 and 8:11 years, divided into three groups: typical, control and clinical. Participants were evaluated using a phonological assessment software, which prompted the spontaneous naming of a series of images. The children's responses were audio recorded and transcribed at the time of the assessment, by the software itself. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the instrument for reliability and validity purposes. Criterion validity was examined by comparing the performance of different groups using Student's t-test for independent samples. Intra- and inter-rater agreement were investigated using Kendall's tau. Results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The present study provided evidence of validity and reliability (internal consistency) for this phonological assessment tool, confirming the reliability of its items and demonstrating excellent agreement rates between examiners regarding its scoring (intra- and inter-rater reliability). The criterion validity assessment demonstrated that the control group outperformed the clinical group across all phonemes, showing that test scores were successful in identifying children with speech sound disorders (phonological disorders).

CONCLUSION

The present findings provide strong evidence of the validity and reliability of this phonological assessment tool.

摘要

目的

提供一种为评估巴西葡萄牙语音位清单而开发的语音评估工具的有效性和可靠性的证据。

方法

该研究纳入了866名年龄在3岁至8岁11个月之间的儿童,分为三组:典型组、对照组和临床组。使用语音评估软件对参与者进行评估,该软件促使他们自发说出一系列图像的名称。儿童的回答在评估时由软件本身进行录音和转录。使用克朗巴哈系数来评估该工具在可靠性和有效性方面的内部一致性。通过使用独立样本的学生t检验比较不同组的表现来检验标准效度。使用肯德尔tau系数研究评分者内和评分者间的一致性。结果在p≤0.05时被认为具有显著性。

结果

本研究为这种语音评估工具提供了有效性和可靠性(内部一致性)的证据,证实了其项目的可靠性,并表明检查者之间在评分方面(评分者内和评分者间可靠性)具有出色的一致率。标准效度评估表明,对照组在所有音素上的表现均优于临床组,表明测试分数成功地识别出了有语音障碍(音位障碍)的儿童。

结论

本研究结果为这种语音评估工具的有效性和可靠性提供了有力证据。

相似文献

1
Evidence of validity and reliability of a phonological assessment tool.一种语音评估工具的效度和信度证据。
Codas. 2018 Jul 2;30(3):e20170180. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017180.
2
Phonological Assessment Instrument: evidence of reliability.语音评估工具:可靠性证据。
Codas. 2023 Nov 10;36(1):e20220303. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022303pt. eCollection 2023.
3
Reliability, validity and normative data of a quick repetition test for Italian children.意大利儿童快速重复测试的信度、效度及常模数据。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;79(6):888-894. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
An articulatory-based disyllabic and trisyllabic Non-Word Repetition test: reliability and validity in Italian 3- to 7-year-old children.一种基于发音的双音节和三音节非词重复测试:在意大利3至7岁儿童中的信度和效度
Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(5):437-456. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1542542. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
5
Single word test for the assessment of speech sound production in Persian speaking children: Development, validity and reliability.用于评估说波斯语儿童语音产生的单字测试:开发、效度与信度
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Nov;114:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
6
Phonological assessment for Greek (PAel) test: Reliability and validity in 4-to 6-year-old preschool children.希腊语语音评估测试(PAel):4 至 6 岁学龄前儿童的信度和效度。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2024 Aug 2;38(8):767-784. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2376684. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
7
Diagnostic validity, accuracy and inter-rater reliability of a phonological assessment for Danish-speaking children.丹麦语儿童语音评估的诊断有效性、准确性和评分者间可靠性。
J Commun Disord. 2022 Jan-Feb;95:106168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106168. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Standardization of a phonetic-phonological test for European-Portuguese children.欧洲葡萄牙语儿童语音-音系测试的标准化
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64(3):151-6. doi: 10.1159/000264712. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
A new scale for the assessment of performance and capacity of hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: reliability and validity studies.一种用于评估偏瘫型脑瘫儿童手部功能表现和能力的新量表:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Oct;50(5):543-56. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
10
The Persian version of auditory word discrimination test (P-AWDT) for children: Development, validity, and reliability.儿童波斯语版听觉单词辨别测试(P-AWDT):开发、效度与信度
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;110:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence of validity and reliability of the Compressed Speech Test with Figures.中文译文:《图片压缩语音测试的有效性和信度的证据》。
Codas. 2024 Mar 25;36(2):e20230065. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232023065pt. eCollection 2024.
2
Evidence of concurrent and predictive criterion validity of the Child Communication Screening Instrument from 0 to 36 months (IRC-36).0 至 36 个月儿童沟通筛查工具(IRC-36)的同时效和预测效标效度的证据。
Codas. 2023 Dec 22;36(1):e20220218. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022218pt. eCollection 2023.
3
Phonological Assessment Instrument: evidence of reliability.
语音评估工具:可靠性证据。
Codas. 2023 Nov 10;36(1):e20220303. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022303pt. eCollection 2023.
4
Phonological Assessment Instrument: evidence of construct validity.语音评估工具:构念效度的证据。
Codas. 2023 Nov 10;36(1):e20220302. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022302pt. eCollection 2023.
5
Phonological Assessment Instrument: evidence of content validity and response processes.语音评估工具:内容效度和反应过程的证据。
Codas. 2023 Oct 23;36(2):e20220324. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022324pt. eCollection 2023.