Akingboye A A, Davies B, Tien T
1 Department of General Surgery, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
2 Department of General Surgery, Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK.
Scand J Surg. 2019 Mar;108(1):55-60. doi: 10.1177/1457496918783721. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
: Appendicitis is a common presentation to hospital with appendectomy being the treatment of choice. Pre-operative administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is common, but obtaining intra-abdominal pus samples is not. After an initial 6-month retrospective audit and departmental teaching on the importance of intra-peritoneal pus sampling, we aimed to determine whether intra-operative pus samples changed antibiotic management.
: Following the initial audit cycle, a 6-month prospective cohort study was conducted. Clinical data were collected on a predetermined proforma to assess the effectiveness of the intervention and antibiotic prescribing practice. The data collected during the whole 1-year period was analyzed.
: During the 1-year period, 440 patients were identified as undergoing a laparoscopic procedure. After exclusion, 261 patients were identified as undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies, of which 141 (54%) were classified as complicated laparoscopic appendectomies. A total of 35 out of 141 (25%) pus samples were sent of which 24 (17%) resulted in positive cultures, with only nine of these positive cultures reported prior to the patient being discharged. No patient had their antibiotic regimen changed as a result of the culture results. There were three cases of cultures resistant to local antibiotics, but without significant clinical outcome. One of these patients developed a post-operative complication, but the antibiotic regimen was changed to broad spectrum rather than a specific antibiotic based on culture sensitivity. Of the 141 patients with complicated laparoscopic appendectomies, five (3.5%) developed post-operative complications: one readmission requiring a laparoscopic washout for pelvic collection, three (2%) cases of pelvic collections managed conservatively, and one case of prolonged paralytic ileus managed non-operatively.
: Overall, none of the patients with positive cultures had a change in prescribed antibiotics based on culture results. Hence, the routine practice of intra-peritoneal pus sampling following complicated appendicitis remains of little clinical value.
阑尾炎是医院常见的病症,阑尾切除术是首选治疗方法。术前使用广谱抗生素很常见,但获取腹腔脓液样本并不常见。在进行了为期6个月的回顾性审计并开展了关于腹腔脓液采样重要性的科室教学后,我们旨在确定术中脓液样本是否会改变抗生素管理。
在初始审计周期之后,进行了为期6个月的前瞻性队列研究。按照预先确定的表格收集临床数据,以评估干预措施的有效性和抗生素处方实践。对整个1年期间收集的数据进行了分析。
在1年期间,确定有440例患者接受了腹腔镜手术。排除后,确定有261例患者接受了腹腔镜阑尾切除术,其中141例(54%)被归类为复杂性腹腔镜阑尾切除术。141例中有35例(25%)送检了脓液样本,其中24例(17%)培养结果为阳性,这些阳性培养结果中只有9例在患者出院前报告。没有患者因培养结果而改变抗生素治疗方案。有3例培养结果显示对局部抗生素耐药,但无明显临床后果。其中1例患者出现术后并发症,但抗生素治疗方案改为广谱抗生素而非根据培养敏感性使用特定抗生素。在141例复杂性腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者中,5例(3.5%)出现术后并发症:1例因盆腔积液需再次入院进行腹腔镜冲洗,3例(2%)盆腔积液采用保守治疗,1例麻痹性肠梗阻采用非手术治疗。
总体而言,培养结果呈阳性的患者均未根据培养结果改变规定的抗生素。因此,复杂性阑尾炎后常规进行腹腔脓液采样的临床价值不大。