Plattner Alex S, Newland Jason G, Wallendorf Michael J, Shakhsheer Baddr A
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):2247-2257. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00502-x. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
This study aims to assess the current epidemiology and microbiology of perforated appendicitis, how antibiotic choice and duration correlate with meaningful clinical outcomes, and whether serial white blood cell (WBC) counts provide clinical value.
Five-year retrospective cohort study, 2015-2019, among 333 consecutive children, ages 0-18 years, treated at St. Louis Children's Hospital for perforated appendicitis. Main outcomes included length of stay (LOS), postoperative abscess formation, and readmission. Statistical analysis was performed with uni- and multi-variate analyses.
Intra-abdominal cultures most commonly grew Bacteroides fragilis (52%) and Escherichia coli (50%). Patients who initially received broad-spectrum antibiotics (meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, fourth-generation cephalosporins) for perforated appendicitis had greater rates of postoperative abscess formation (25% vs. 12%, p < 0.01) and LOS (7.0 vs. 5.7 days, p < 0.01). Similarly, antibiotics at time of discharge were associated with greater postoperative abscess formation (22% vs. 9%, p < 0.01) and LOS (6.4 vs. 5.6 days, p = 0.02). However, discharge with strictly oral antibiotics was not correlated with greater LOS, postoperative abscess formation, or readmission rates compared to discharge without antibiotics. Serial WBC counts had no predictive value for LOS, postoperative abscess formation, or readmission.
Bacteroides fragilis and E. coli were the most common intra-abdominal microbes for perforated appendicitis among our cohort. In non-critically ill children, the routine use of broad-spectrum antibiotics or continuation of antibiotics beyond discharge was not correlated with improved clinical outcomes. Additionally, WBC counts were not correlated with meaningful clinical outcomes.
本研究旨在评估穿孔性阑尾炎的当前流行病学和微生物学情况,抗生素的选择和使用时长与有意义的临床结局之间的相关性,以及连续白细胞(WBC)计数是否具有临床价值。
对2015年至2019年在圣路易斯儿童医院接受治疗的333例0至18岁连续穿孔性阑尾炎患儿进行为期五年的回顾性队列研究。主要结局包括住院时长(LOS)、术后脓肿形成和再次入院情况。采用单变量和多变量分析进行统计分析。
腹腔内培养最常见的细菌是脆弱拟杆菌(52%)和大肠杆菌(50%)。最初因穿孔性阑尾炎接受广谱抗生素(美罗培南、哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦、第四代头孢菌素)治疗的患者术后脓肿形成率更高(25%对12%,p < 0.01),住院时长也更长(7.0天对5.7天,p < 0.01)。同样,出院时使用抗生素与更高的术后脓肿形成率(22%对9%,p < 0.01)和住院时长(6.4天对5.6天,p = 0.02)相关。然而,与未使用抗生素出院相比,仅使用口服抗生素出院与更长的住院时长、术后脓肿形成或再次入院率无关。连续白细胞计数对住院时长、术后脓肿形成或再次入院没有预测价值。
在我们的队列中,脆弱拟杆菌和大肠杆菌是穿孔性阑尾炎最常见的腹腔内微生物。在非危重症儿童中,常规使用广谱抗生素或出院后继续使用抗生素与改善临床结局无关。此外,白细胞计数与有意义的临床结局无关。