Suppr超能文献

冷冻牛肉和奶牛精液中的精子质量。

Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen.

作者信息

Morrell Jane Margaret, Valeanu Andra Sabina, Lundeheim Nils, Johannisson Anders

机构信息

Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iaşi, 3, Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iaşi, Romania.

出版信息

Acta Vet Scand. 2018 Jul 4;60(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0396-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is speculation that beef bull semen quality is inferior to that of dairy bulls although few scientific studies are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate sperm quality in beef bull semen and to determine which parameters could be indicative of fertility after insemination. Sperm quality, assessed by computer assisted sperm motility analysis and flow cytometric evaluation of membrane integrity, levels of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, acrosome status and DNA fragmentation index, was evaluated in beef and dairy bull semen.

RESULTS

For beef bulls, normal morphology (r = 0.62, P < 0.05) and WOBBLE (r = 0.57, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with 56-day non-return rate, whereas sperm quality was not significantly correlated with the fertility index score for dairy bulls. Membrane integrity (46 ± 8.0% versus 40 ± 11%, P < 0.05), normal morphology (87 ± 6% versus 76 ± 8%; P < 0.05), and high respiratory activity (52 ± 13 versus 12 ± 4%; P < 0.001) were higher for dairy bulls than for beef bulls. The DNA fragmentation index was lower for dairy bull spermatozoa than beef (3.8 ± 1.1% versus 6.1 ± 2.9%; P < 0.01), whereas some sperm kinematics were higher. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of bull (beef versus dairy) had an impact on sperm quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Different assays of sperm quality may be needed for appropriate analysis of beef and dairy bull semen. These finding could be important for cattle breeding stations when evaluating semen quality.

摘要

背景

尽管文献中鲜有科学研究,但有人推测肉用公牛精液质量低于乳用公牛。本研究旨在评估肉用公牛精液的精子质量,并确定哪些参数可指示授精后的生育力。通过计算机辅助精子活力分析以及膜完整性、活性氧水平、线粒体膜电位、顶体状态和DNA碎片化指数的流式细胞术评估,对肉用和乳用公牛精液的精子质量进行了评估。

结果

对于肉用公牛,正常形态(r = 0.62,P < 0.05)和摆动(r = 0.57,P < 0.05)与56天不返情率显著相关,而精子质量与乳用公牛的生育指数评分无显著相关性。乳用公牛的膜完整性(46 ± 8.0% 对 40 ± 11%,P < 0.05)、正常形态(87 ± 6% 对 76 ± 8%;P < 0.05)和高呼吸活性(52 ± 13 对 12 ± 4%;P < 0.001)均高于肉用公牛。乳用公牛精子的DNA碎片化指数低于肉用公牛(3.8 ± 1.1% 对 6.1 ± 2.9%;P < 0.01),而一些精子运动学指标较高。多变量分析表明,公牛类型(肉用与乳用)对精子质量有影响。

结论

对肉用和乳用公牛精液进行适当分析可能需要不同的精子质量检测方法。这些发现对于牛育种站评估精液质量可能具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ba7/6031104/38443ffc5c5d/13028_2018_396_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验