• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运动员心电图解读中 BMJ 学习训练模块的表现。

Performance of the BMJ learning training modules for ECG interpretation in athletes.

机构信息

Athlete Health and Performance Research Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Heart. 2018 Dec;104(24):2051-2057. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313066. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313066
PMID:29973340
Abstract

To assess the accuracy of interpreting the athlete's ECG both pre and post a series of online training modules among a range of healthcare professionals. 10 512 healthcare professionals from 138 different nations commenced the online course. These were primarily doctors (43%), nurses (18.4%) and other healthcare professionals (3.9%). The users came from 102 different specialities, with General Practice/Family Medicine (24.5%), Cardiology (10.6%), Emergency Medicine (8.7%) and Sports Medicine (6.6%) predominating. Among the 2023 users who completed both the pre-course and post-course test, there was an overall improvement of 15.3% (95% CI 13.9% to 16.6%; p<0.001). 930 completed all four other modules, and these users fared significantly better (18.7% increase; 95% CI 17.3 to 20.0) than those completing no additional modules (11.7% increase; 95% CI 3.3 to 17.7, p=0.036). Demographic analysis showed that while the starting pre-test scores varied significantly between profession/specialty groups (57.8%-82.6%), post-test scores were largely consistent (80.8%-84.6%). Although users showed the most improvement when interpreting primary electrical diseases (12.4% increase), it was also an area of notable weakness compared with the modules of normal training-related findings and cardiomyopathies. With the evolving criteria for ECG interpretation eliciting ever improving levels of specificity and sensitivity in the detection of conditions associated with sudden cardiac death among athletes, training is required to ensure the infrastructure and personnel is in place to uphold these standards. The BMJ Learning course presented is a valuable first step and demonstrates that such an online tool can be effective in aiding ECG interpretation among healthcare professionals globally.

摘要

评估一系列在线培训模块前后,医疗保健专业人员解读运动员心电图的准确性。来自 138 个不同国家的 10512 名医疗保健专业人员开始参加在线课程。这些人员主要是医生(43%)、护士(18.4%)和其他医疗保健专业人员(3.9%)。用户来自 102 个不同的专业,其中普通科/家庭医学(24.5%)、心脏病学(10.6%)、急诊医学(8.7%)和运动医学(6.6%)居多。在完成预测试和后测试的 2023 名用户中,总体提高了 15.3%(95%置信区间为 13.9%至 16.6%;p<0.001)。有 930 人完成了其他四个模块,这些用户的表现明显更好(增加 18.7%;95%置信区间为 17.3%至 20.0),而没有完成其他模块的用户增加了 11.7%(95%置信区间为 3.3%至 17.7,p=0.036)。人口统计学分析表明,虽然专业/专科组的初始预测试分数差异显著(57.8%-82.6%),但后测试分数差异不大(80.8%-84.6%)。虽然用户在解读原发性电疾病时的提高最为显著(增加 12.4%),但与正常训练相关发现和心肌病模块相比,这也是一个明显的薄弱环节。随着 ECG 解读标准的不断发展,在检测与运动员猝死相关的疾病时,特异性和敏感性不断提高,需要进行培训以确保基础设施和人员到位,以维持这些标准。本研究中呈现的 BMJ 学习课程是一个有价值的第一步,证明了这样一个在线工具可以有效地帮助全球医疗保健专业人员解读心电图。

相似文献

1
Performance of the BMJ learning training modules for ECG interpretation in athletes.运动员心电图解读中 BMJ 学习训练模块的表现。
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(24):2051-2057. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313066. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Evolving interpretation of the athlete's electrocardiogram: from European Society of Cardiology and Stanford criteria, to Seattle criteria and beyond.运动员心电图解读的演变:从欧洲心脏病学会和斯坦福标准,到西雅图标准及其他。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
Comments on the New International Criteria for Electrocardiographic Interpretation in Athletes.关于运动员心电图解读新国际标准的评论
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Nov;70(11):983-990. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram in Athletes.运动员心电图解读
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Apr;32(4):438-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
5
[The athlete's ECG : What is normal or abnormal?].[运动员的心电图:何为正常或异常?]
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2023 Mar;34(1):10-18. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00917-0. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
6
Clinical meaning of isolated increase of QRS voltages in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy versus athlete's heart.肥厚型心肌病与运动员心脏中QRS电压孤立性升高的临床意义。
J Electrocardiol. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Electrocardiographic interpretation in athletes: the 'Seattle criteria'.运动员心电图解读:“西雅图标准”。
Br J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;47(3):122-4. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092067.
8
The Electrocardiogram in Highly Trained Athletes.训练有素的运动员的心电图
Clin Sports Med. 2015 Jul;34(3):419-31. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
[CME ECC 65: The Athlete's ECG].[继续医学教育 心电图课程65:运动员心电图]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2020;109(4):253-258. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003453.
10
Electrocardiographic findings suggestive of cardiomyopathy: what to look for and what to do next.提示心肌病的心电图表现:应寻找什么以及接下来该做什么。
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Mar-Apr;12(2):77-85. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3182874abb.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Module Based Method of Teaching Electrocardiogram Interpretation for Emergency Medicine Residents.一种基于模块的急诊科住院医师心电图解读教学新方法。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 15;7(4):SG15-SG60. doi: 10.21980/J8Z06J. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
World netball cardiac screening guidelines.世界无挡板篮球心脏筛查指南。
S Afr J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):v34i1a13979. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a13979. eCollection 2022.
3
Cardiac evaluation of young athletes: Time for a risk-based approach?年轻运动员的心脏评估:是否采用基于风险的方法?
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):906-914. doi: 10.1002/clc.23364. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Interassociation Consensus Statement on Cardiovascular Care of College Student-Athletes.大学生运动员心血管护理协会间共识声明
J Athl Train. 2016 Apr;51(4):344-57. doi: 10.4085/j.jacc.2016.03.527. Epub 2016 Apr 25.