Stecher Heiko I, Herrmann Christoph S
Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for all", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Research Center Neurosensory Science, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 20;9:984. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00984. eCollection 2018.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has found widespread use as a basic tool in the exploration of the role of brain oscillations. Many studies have shown that frequency-specific tACS is able to not only alter cognitive processes during stimulation, but also cause specific physiological aftereffects visible in the electroencephalogram (EEG). The relationship between the emergence of these aftereffects and the necessary duration of stimulation is inconclusive. Our goal in this study was to narrow down the crucial length of tACS-blocks, by which aftereffects can be elicited. We stimulated participants with α-tACS in four blocks of 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-min length, once in increasing and once in decreasing order. After each block, we measured the resting EEG for 10 min during a visual vigilance task. We could not find lasting enhancement of α-power following any stimulation block, when comparing the stimulated groups to the sham group. These findings offer no information regarding the crucial stimulation duration. In addition, this conflicts with previous findings, showing a power increase following 10 min of tACS in the alpha range. We performed additional explorative analyses, based on known confounds of (1) mismatches between stimulation frequency and individual alpha frequency and (2) abnormalities in baseline α-activity. The results of an ANCOVA suggested that both factor explain variance, but could not resolve how exactly both factors interfere with the stimulation effect. Employing a linear mixed model, we found a significant effect of stimulation following 10 min of α-tACS in the increasing sequence and a significant effect of the mismatch between stimulated frequency and individual alpha frequency. The implications of these findings for future research are discussed.
经颅交流电刺激(tACS)作为探索脑振荡作用的一种基本工具已得到广泛应用。许多研究表明,频率特异性tACS不仅能够在刺激期间改变认知过程,还能在脑电图(EEG)中引发可见的特定生理后效应。这些后效应的出现与刺激所需持续时间之间的关系尚无定论。我们在本研究中的目标是缩小能够引发后效应的tACS刺激块的关键时长。我们用α-tACS以1分钟、3分钟、5分钟和10分钟时长的四个刺激块刺激参与者,一次按递增顺序,一次按递减顺序。在每个刺激块之后,我们在视觉警觉任务期间测量10分钟的静息EEG。将刺激组与假刺激组进行比较时,我们发现在任何刺激块之后都没有α波功率的持续增强。这些发现没有提供关于关键刺激持续时间的信息。此外,这与之前的研究结果相矛盾,之前的研究显示在α频段进行10分钟的tACS后功率增加。我们基于已知的混杂因素(1)刺激频率与个体α频率不匹配以及(2)基线α活动异常进行了额外的探索性分析。协方差分析的结果表明这两个因素都能解释方差,但无法确定这两个因素究竟是如何干扰刺激效果的。采用线性混合模型,我们发现在递增序列中进行10分钟的α-tACS刺激后有显著的刺激效应,以及刺激频率与个体α频率不匹配有显著效应。我们讨论了这些发现对未来研究的启示。