Nematifard Elahe, Ardehali Seyed Hossein, Shahbazi Shaahin, Eini-Zinab Hassan, Vahdat Shariatpanahi Zahra
International Branch, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Shohada Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Crit Care Res Pract. 2018 Jun 3;2018:5490346. doi: 10.1155/2018/5490346. eCollection 2018.
The objective of the present study was to compare the ability of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scoring systems with the combination of an anthropometric variable score "adductor pollicis muscle (APM) thickness" to the APACHE systems in predicting mortality in the intensive care unit.
A prospective observational study was conducted with the APM thickness in the dominant hand, and APACHE II and III scores were measured for each patient upon admission. Given scores for the APM thickness were added to APACHE score systems to make two composite scores of APACHE II-APM and APACHE III-APM. The accuracy of the two composite models and APACHE II and III systems in predicting mortality of patients was compared using the area under the ROC curve.
Three hundred and four patients with the mean age of 54.75 ± 18.28 years were studied, of which 96 (31.57%) patients died. Median (interquartile range) of APACHE II and III scores was 15 (12-20) and 47 (33-66), respectively. Median (interquartile range) of APM thickness was 15 (12-17) mm, respectively. The area under the ROC curves for the prediction of mortality was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.715-0.827), 0.802 (95% CI: 0.751-0.854), 0.851 (95% CI: 0.807-0.896), and 0.865 (95% CI: 0.822-0.908) for APACHE II, APACHE III, APACHE II-APM, and APACHE III-APM, respectively.
Although improvements in the area under ROC curves were not statistically significant when the APM thickness added to the APACHE systems, but the numerical value added to AUCs are considerable.
本研究的目的是比较急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)评分系统以及结合人体测量变量评分“拇收肌(APM)厚度”的APACHE系统预测重症监护病房死亡率的能力。
进行一项前瞻性观察性研究,测量优势手的APM厚度,并在每位患者入院时测量APACHE II和III评分。将给定的APM厚度评分添加到APACHE评分系统中,得出APACHE II-APM和APACHE III-APM两个综合评分。使用ROC曲线下面积比较两种综合模型以及APACHE II和III系统预测患者死亡率的准确性。
对304例平均年龄为54.75±18.28岁的患者进行了研究,其中96例(31.57%)患者死亡。APACHE II和III评分的中位数(四分位间距)分别为15(12-20)和47(33-66)。APM厚度的中位数(四分位间距)分别为15(12-17)mm。APACHE II、APACHE III、APACHE II-APM和APACHE III-APM预测死亡率的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.771(95%CI:0.715-0.827)、0.802(95%CI:0.751-0.854)、0.851(95%CI:0.807-0.896)和0.865(95%CI:0.822-0.908)。
虽然将APM厚度添加到APACHE系统时,ROC曲线下面积的改善无统计学意义,但添加到AUC的数值相当可观。