Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Microelectromechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMinho), University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
Dom Henrique Research Centre, Porto, Portugal.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Mar;27(3):745-757. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5043-y. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
Summarize the in vivo instrumented-assisted patellofemoral evaluation methods for quantifying the patellar mobility in response to a known external force.
A systematic review using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases was conducted to search for studies reporting in vivo instrumented-assisted patellofemoral evaluation of patellar mobility. Searches were conducted in duplicate up to October 2017. Methodologic quality of included articles was assessed using a modified version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) critical appraisal tool.
From the original 2614 records, 9 studies comprising 568 individuals (24 ± 4.8 years old, 51.4% females)-355 (62.5%) asymptomatic individuals, 87 (15.3%) patellofemoral pain, and 126 (22.2%) patellofemoral instability patients-were included. The average maximum force applied by the instruments to the patella was 38.9 ± 27.7 N (range 11.25 to 80 N). Patellar displacement ranged from 3.9 to 10.4 mm, medially, and 3.5 to 14.8 mm, laterally, for asymptomatic individuals. For patellofemoral instability patients, these values were higher, ranging from 3.8 to 22.1 mm, medially, and 7.0 to 21.9 mm, laterally, being these mean values similar across the instability subgroups (medial, lateral, or multidirectional). Patellofemoral pain had a mean of 10 mm and 10.9 mm for medial and lateral displacements, respectively. Mean methodological quality score was 9.8 ± 2.6 (range 6-13) out of 18 possible points.
There is high heterogeneity within the available instrumented assessment methods and respective measurement outcomes, highlighting the need for better methodological standardization and further developments in this field. This would allow a more accurate and reliable quantification of patellar movement and, subsequently, improve diagnosis, and refine treatment.
Systematic review of level II-IV studies, Level IV.
总结用于量化在已知外力作用下髌股关节活动度的体内仪器辅助髌股评估方法。
使用 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 SPORTDiscus 电子数据库进行系统综述,以检索报告体内仪器辅助髌股关节活动度评估的髌股关节活动度的研究。截至 2017 年 10 月,进行了两次搜索。使用修改后的批判性评价技能计划(CASP)批判性评价工具评估纳入文章的方法学质量。
从最初的 2614 条记录中,纳入了 9 项研究,共 568 人(24 ± 4.8 岁,51.4%为女性)-355 名(62.5%)无症状个体,87 名(15.3%)髌股疼痛,126 名(22.2%)髌股关节不稳定患者。仪器对髌骨施加的最大平均力为 38.9 ± 27.7 N(范围 11.25 至 80 N)。无症状个体的髌股内侧位移为 3.9 至 10.4 mm,外侧为 3.5 至 14.8 mm。对于髌股关节不稳定患者,这些值更高,内侧为 3.8 至 22.1 mm,外侧为 7.0 至 21.9 mm,这些平均值在不稳定亚组之间相似(内侧、外侧或多向)。髌股疼痛的内侧和外侧位移分别为 10 毫米和 10.9 毫米。方法学质量平均得分为 18 分中的 9.8 ± 2.6(范围 6-13)。
现有仪器评估方法和各自的测量结果存在很大的异质性,这突出表明需要更好的方法学标准化和该领域的进一步发展。这将允许更准确和可靠地量化髌骨运动,并随后改善诊断和治疗。
系统综述 II-IV 级研究,IV 级。