Suppr超能文献

智能手机应用程序中的隐私问题:头痛/偏头痛应用程序分析。

Privacy Issues in Smartphone Applications: An Analysis of Headache/Migraine Applications.

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Population Health, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA (Mia T. Minen).

Technology and Privacy Attorney, New York, NY, USA (Eric J. Stieglitz).

出版信息

Headache. 2018 Jul;58(7):1014-1027. doi: 10.1111/head.13341. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Headache diaries are a mainstay of migraine management. While many commercial smartphone applications (apps) have been developed for people with migraine, little is known about how well these apps protect patient information and whether they are secure to use.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess whether there are privacy issues surrounding apps so that physicians and patients could better understand what medical information patients are providing to the app companies, and the potential privacy implications of how the app companies (and other third parties) might use that information.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the most popular "headache" and "migraine" apps and developed a database of the types of data the apps requested for input by the user and whether the apps had clear privacy policies. We also examined the content of the privacy policies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine apps were examined (14 diary apps, 15 relaxation apps). Of the diary applications, 79% (11/14) had visible privacy policies. Of the diary apps with privacy policies, all (11/11) stated whether or not the app collects and stores information remotely. A total of 55% (6/11) stated that some user data were used to serve targeted advertisements. A total of 11/15 (73%) of the relaxation apps had privacy policies.

CONCLUSIONS

Headache apps shared information with third parties, posing privacy risks partly because there are few legal protections against the sale or disclosure of data from medical apps to third parties.

摘要

背景

头痛日记是偏头痛管理的主要方法。虽然已经开发出许多针对偏头痛患者的商业智能手机应用程序(app),但对于这些应用程序在保护患者信息方面的效果以及使用这些应用程序是否安全的问题知之甚少。

目的

我们旨在评估是否存在与应用程序相关的隐私问题,以便医生和患者能够更好地了解患者向应用程序公司提供哪些医疗信息,以及应用程序公司(和其他第三方)可能如何使用这些信息所带来的潜在隐私影响。

方法

我们对最受欢迎的“头痛”和“偏头痛”应用程序进行了系统搜索,并建立了一个数据库,其中包含应用程序要求用户输入的各种数据类型,以及应用程序是否具有明确的隐私政策。我们还检查了隐私政策的内容。

结果

共检查了 29 个应用程序(14 个日记应用程序,15 个放松应用程序)。在日记应用程序中,79%(11/14)具有可见的隐私政策。在具有隐私政策的日记应用程序中,全部(11/11)都声明应用程序是否远程收集和存储信息。共有 55%(6/11)的应用程序声明部分用户数据用于提供定向广告。共有 11/15(73%)的放松应用程序具有隐私政策。

结论

头痛应用程序与第三方共享信息,带来了隐私风险,部分原因是针对从医疗应用程序向第三方出售或披露数据的法律保护很少。

相似文献

1
Privacy Issues in Smartphone Applications: An Analysis of Headache/Migraine Applications.
Headache. 2018 Jul;58(7):1014-1027. doi: 10.1111/head.13341. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
3
Assessment of the Data Sharing and Privacy Practices of Smartphone Apps for Depression and Smoking Cessation.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e192542. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2542.
6
The Functionality, Evidence, and Privacy Issues Around Smartphone Apps for the Top Neuropsychiatric Conditions.
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Winter;33(1):72-79. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19120353. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1248.
9
Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality.
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 17;17(8):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4581.
10
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.

引用本文的文献

5
Use of pager devices in New Zealand public hospitals as a critical communication tool: Barriers & way forward.
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 26;9(8):e18717. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18717. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
mHealth Solutions for Mental Health Screening and Diagnosis: A Review of App User Perspectives Using Sentiment and Thematic Analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 27;13:857304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857304. eCollection 2022.
9
mBrain: towards the continuous follow-up and headache classification of primary headache disorder patients.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01813-w.
10
Pulse Oximeter App Privacy Policies During COVID-19: Scoping Assessment.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):e30361. doi: 10.2196/30361.

本文引用的文献

1
A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluation and Informed Decision Making Regarding Smartphone Apps for Clinical Care.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1;69(5):498-500. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700423. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
2
Data Security and Privacy in Apps for Dementia: An Analysis of Existing Privacy Policies.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;25(8):873-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. eCollection 2017.
4
Many Mobile Health Apps Target High-Need, High-Cost Populations, But Gaps Remain.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Dec 1;35(12):2310-2318. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0578.
5
Privacy Policies of Android Diabetes Apps and Sharing of Health Information.
JAMA. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):1051-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.19426.
7
Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00471-X. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 4;3(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4924.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验