Suppr超能文献

微创颈部清扫术:45例患者的3年回顾性研究经验

Minimally invasive neck dissection: A 3-year retrospective experience of 45 cases.

作者信息

Nayak Sandeep P, Devaprasad M, Khan Ameenudhin

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Fortis Hospital; MACS Clinic, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2019 Oct-Dec;15(4):293-298. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_40_18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Robot-assisted neck dissection requires a larger wound, is expensive and requires specialised equipment which is not easily available. We have developed an inexpensive minimally invasive neck dissection (MIND) procedure using simple endoscopic instruments in the past. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety, efficacy and reproducibility of the technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2016, we performed MIND on 45 patients with oral cancer using the standard endoscopic equipment. CO gas insufflation was used to create the working space. Intra-operative data, post-operative data and pathological characteristics were evaluated and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the Log-Rank test.

RESULTS

Median operative time was 130 (80-190) min with a mean blood loss of 63 (20-150) ml. Major intra-operative complications were not observed. The median number of nodes retrieved was 14 (range: 7-38). Three patients with a positive lymph node were advised to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy. After consultation, 12 out of 13 tongue cancer patients with a tumour depth >3 mm underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Mean follow-up period was 31.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 27.9-35.1) months and 27.8 (95% CI 23.6-32.1) months for OS and DFS, respectively. Four (8.9%) deaths and 8 (17.8%) recurrences were observed. The 3-year OS and DFS was 91.1% and 82.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MIND is aesthetically better than conventional procedures for oral cancer patients due to its safety, efficacy and reproducibility at any centre using the standard laparoscopic equipment.

摘要

目的

机器人辅助颈部清扫术需要更大的创口,成本高昂且需要不易获取的专业设备。过去我们已研发出一种使用简单内镜器械的低成本微创颈部清扫术(MIND)。本研究旨在评估该技术的安全性、有效性及可重复性。

材料与方法

2013年1月至2016年12月,我们使用标准内镜设备对45例口腔癌患者实施了MIND。采用二氧化碳气体注入来创建工作空间。评估术中数据、术后数据及病理特征,并使用对数秩检验比较总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的Kaplan-Meier曲线。

结果

中位手术时间为130(80 - 190)分钟,平均失血量为63(20 - 150)毫升。未观察到术中严重并发症。中位清扫淋巴结数量为14个(范围:7 - 38个)。3例淋巴结阳性患者被建议接受辅助放疗。经会诊,13例肿瘤深度>3毫米的舌癌患者中有12例接受了辅助放疗。OS和DFS的平均随访期分别为31.5(95%置信区间[CI] 27.9 - 35.1)个月和27.8(95% CI 23.6 - 32.1)个月。观察到4例(8.9%)死亡和8例(17.8%)复发。3年OS和DFS分别为91.1%和82.2%。

结论

对于口腔癌患者,MIND在美学上优于传统手术,因其在任何中心使用标准腹腔镜设备时都具有安全性、有效性及可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c479/6839352/9a6defa1c86e/JMAS-15-293-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验