• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量教师教学实践与学生学业参与度:一项收敛效度研究。

Measuring teacher practices and student academic engagement: A convergent validity study.

作者信息

Lekwa Adam J, Reddy Linda A, Shernoff Elisa S

机构信息

Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.

出版信息

Sch Psychol Q. 2019 Jan;34(1):109-118. doi: 10.1037/spq0000268. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1037/spq0000268
PMID:29975100
Abstract

We examined the convergent validity of observer ratings of teachers' use of evidence-based instructional and behavior management practices using the Classroom Strategies Assessment System (CSAS; Reddy & Dudek, 2014) with student academic engagement as measured by the Cooperative Learning Observational Code for Kids (CLOCK; Volpe & DiPerna, 2010). This study was conducted with a sample of 107 teachers and 2,000 students in 11 urban elementary schools serving students in a community with high concentrations of poverty. Correlational and multiple linear regression analyses examined whether CSAS instructional and behavior management scores predicted classwide academic engagement. Results provide initial evidence of the relationship between observer ratings of teacher practices and student engagement. Specifically, CSAS scores indicating higher quality instruction and behavior management were associated with higher student engagement. Multiple linear regression revealed that instructional practice scores (as measured by the CSAS) uniquely predicted student academic engagement (i.e., attention and participation during instruction) while behavior management practice scores did not. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们使用课堂策略评估系统(CSAS;雷迪和杜德克,2014年)检验了观察者对教师使用循证教学和行为管理实践的评分的收敛效度,同时以儿童合作学习观察代码(CLOCK;沃尔普和迪佩尔纳,2010年)衡量学生的学业参与度。本研究以11所城市小学的107名教师和2000名学生为样本,这些学校服务于一个贫困集中度高的社区中的学生。相关分析和多元线性回归分析检验了CSAS教学和行为管理得分是否能预测全班级的学业参与度。结果为教师实践的观察者评分与学生参与度之间的关系提供了初步证据。具体而言,表明更高质量教学和行为管理的CSAS得分与更高的学生参与度相关。多元线性回归显示,教学实践得分(由CSAS衡量)能独特地预测学生的学业参与度(即教学期间的注意力和参与度),而行为管理实践得分则不能。本文讨论了对未来研究和实践的启示。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Measuring teacher practices and student academic engagement: A convergent validity study.衡量教师教学实践与学生学业参与度:一项收敛效度研究。
Sch Psychol Q. 2019 Jan;34(1):109-118. doi: 10.1037/spq0000268. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
2
Assessment of teaching to predict gains in student achievement in urban schools.评估教学对预测城市学校学生成绩提高的作用。
Sch Psychol. 2019 May;34(3):271-280. doi: 10.1037/spq0000293. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
3
Coaching to improve teacher instruction and behavior management in a high poverty school: A case study.指导改善高贫困率学校教师教学及行为管理:一项案例研究
Sch Psychol Q. 2019 Jan;34(1):14-21. doi: 10.1037/spq0000302. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
A randomized controlled trial of instructional coaching in high-poverty urban schools: Examining teacher practices and student outcomes.一项在高贫困城市学校中开展的教学指导的随机对照试验:考察教师实践与学生成果。
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Jun;86:151-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Teacher coaching supported by formative assessment for improving classroom practices.通过形成性评估支持教师辅导以改进课堂实践。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Jun;33(2):293-304. doi: 10.1037/spq0000223. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
6
Associations among teachers' depressive symptoms and students' classroom instructional experiences in third grade.教师抑郁症状与三年级学生课堂教学体验的关联。
J Sch Psychol. 2018 Aug;69:154-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
7
Instructional and behavior management practices implemented by elementary general education teachers.小学普通教育教师实施的教学和行为管理实践。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Dec;51(6):683-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
First grade classroom-level adversity: Associations with teaching practices, academic skills, and executive functioning.一年级课堂层面的逆境:与教学实践、学术技能和执行功能的关联。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Dec;33(4):547-560. doi: 10.1037/spq0000235. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Student, teacher, and classroom predictors of between-teacher variance of students' teacher-rated behavior.学生、教师及课堂因素对学生教师评价行为的教师间差异的预测作用
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Sep;33(3):460-468. doi: 10.1037/spq0000241. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
10
Observer and student ratings of the class environment: A preliminary investigation of convergence.课堂环境的观察者与学生评分:收敛性的初步调查
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Dec;32(4):465-479. doi: 10.1037/spq0000176. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of coaches' autonomy support on athletes' aggressive behavior and athlete burnout: verification of the mediating effects of coach-athlete relationship and team efficacy.教练自主支持对运动员攻击性行为和运动员倦怠的影响:教练-运动员关系和团队效能中介效应的验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 30;15:1388185. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1388185. eCollection 2024.
2
Avoiding Academic Burnout: Academic Factors That Enhance University Student Engagement.避免学术倦怠:提升大学生参与度的学术因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;13(12):989. doi: 10.3390/bs13120989.
3
Automated Student Classroom Behaviors' Perception and Identification Using Motion Sensors.
利用运动传感器对学生课堂行为进行自动感知与识别
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;10(2):127. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020127.
4
A Data-Driven Approach to Quantify and Measure Students' Engagement in Synchronous Virtual Learning Environments.一种量化和衡量学生在同步虚拟学习环境中参与度的数据分析方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 25;22(9):3294. doi: 10.3390/s22093294.
5
How Has the COVID-19 Crisis Affected the Academic Stress of University Students? The Role of Teachers and Students.新冠疫情危机如何影响大学生的学业压力?教师与学生的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 1;12:626340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626340. eCollection 2021.
6
Self-Regulation and Regulatory Teaching as Determinants of Academic Behavioral Confidence and Procrastination in Undergraduate Students.自我调节与规范性教学对本科生学业行为信心及拖延行为的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 10;12:602904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.602904. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of Self-Regulation vs. External Regulation on the Factors and Symptoms of Academic Stress in Undergraduate Students.自我调节与外部调节对本科生学业压力因素及症状的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 26;11:1773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01773. eCollection 2020.
8
A Structural Equation Model of Achievement Emotions, Coping Strategies and Engagement-Burnout in Undergraduate Students: A Possible Underlying Mechanism in Facets of Perfectionism.成就情绪、应对策略与本科生投入-倦怠的结构方程模型:完美主义各维度的潜在作用机制
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 22;17(6):2106. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062106.
9
Effects of Levels of Self-Regulation and Regulatory Teaching on Strategies for Coping With Academic Stress in Undergraduate Students.自我调节水平和调节性教学对本科生应对学业压力策略的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00022. eCollection 2020.