Gergeleit Hauke, Verspohl Jutta, Rohde Judith, Rohn Karl, Ohnesorge Bernhard, Bienert-Zeit Astrid
Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 9, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Institute for Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173, Hannover, Germany.
Acta Vet Scand. 2018 Jul 5;60(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0394-4.
Diagnostics in equine sinusitis can be challenging and often require a combination of different imaging tools to ascertain its underlying aetiology. The bacterial flora of healthy and diseased paranasal sinuses, respectively, has only sporadically been assessed in horses. The objectives of this study were to determine whether assessment of microbiological features of secretions from the paranasal sinuses displays a useful diagnostic tool in equine sinusitis to distinguish between different aetiologies. Secretion samples from 50 horses with sinusitis and from 10 healthy horses were taken transendoscopically from the drainage angle of the nasomaxillary aperture using a guidable Swing Tip catheter. Bacteria found in healthy and diseased equine sinuses were compared. Endoscopic samples in all healthy and 19 diseased horses were compared with samples taken directly from the affected sinus after trephination.
Eleven of the 14 horses with primary sinusitis revealed growth of Streptococcus equi ssp. zooepidemicus, with three samples yielding pure cultures. Anaerobes were found in 15 out of 26 samples from horses with dental sinusitis. Healthy sinuses revealed mainly α-haemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci or showed no growth. Enterobacteriaceae were found more frequently in secondary sinusitis. There were significant differences in the bacterial composition and diversity (P < 0.05) between primary sinusitis, dental sinusitis and healthy controls. The correlation between endoscopic and trephination samples was satisfying.
Microbiological examination of secretions from horses with sinusitis collected transendoscopically can help to distinguish between primary and dental sinusitis. Therefore, it may display a feasible ancillary diagnostic tool, but does not replace a meticulous examination procedure including diagnostic imaging.
马鼻窦炎的诊断具有挑战性,通常需要结合不同的成像工具来确定其潜在病因。健康和患病马鼻窦的细菌菌群仅偶尔进行过评估。本研究的目的是确定评估鼻窦分泌物的微生物特征是否是马鼻窦炎中区分不同病因的有用诊断工具。使用可引导的摆动尖端导管,经鼻内镜从50匹鼻窦炎马和10匹健康马的鼻上颌窦开口引流角采集分泌物样本。比较健康和患病马鼻窦中发现的细菌。将所有健康马和19匹患病马的内镜样本与钻孔后直接从受影响鼻窦采集的样本进行比较。
14匹原发性鼻窦炎马中有11匹培养出兽疫链球菌亚种马疫亚种,3个样本为纯培养物。在26例牙源性鼻窦炎马的样本中,有15例发现厌氧菌。健康鼻窦主要显示α-溶血性链球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,或无细菌生长。肠杆菌科在继发性鼻窦炎中更常见。原发性鼻窦炎、牙源性鼻窦炎和健康对照组之间的细菌组成和多样性存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。内镜样本和钻孔样本之间的相关性良好。
经鼻内镜采集的鼻窦炎马分泌物的微生物学检查有助于区分原发性和牙源性鼻窦炎。因此,它可能是一种可行的辅助诊断工具,但不能替代包括诊断性成像在内的细致检查程序。