• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较髋关节和膝关节置换术患者伤口敷料的开放标签随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

López-Parra Maria, Gil-Rey Dolors, López-González Esmeralda, González-Rodríguez Eva-Maria, Simó-Sánchez Isabel, Zamora-Carmona Francisco, Roqueta-Andreu Lidia, Arizu-Puigvert Marta, Abril-Sabater Dolors, Moreno-Álvarez Àngels, López-Bonet Àngels, López-Hidalgo Gisela, Costa-Ventura Helena, García-Pardo Laura, Rico-Liberato Mireia, García-Borràs Miriam, Arnal-Leris Maria Teresa, Sianes-Gallén Mònica, Vives Roser

机构信息

Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí I3PT, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Parc Taulí 1, 08208 Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.

Capresa, prevención de riesgos laborales, C/ Badajoz, 145, 08018, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Trials. 2018 Jul 5;19(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2755-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-018-2755-8
PMID:29976227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6034240/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical wounds are covered to prevent bleeding, absorb the exudates, and provide a barrier against external contamination. Currently, in our hospital, after orthopedic surgery, traditional occlusive dressing of sterile gauze and non-woven hypoallergenic adhesive tape is placed. Some of the newest dressings have been shown to reduce the incidence of blisters compared with traditional dressing or colloid adhesive dressings. However, there are no comparative evaluations between the different types of dressings and their contribution to the overall results of the healing process.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial to compare five types of dressings used in total knee and hip arthroplasty surgical wounds. A total of 550 patients will be randomly allocated to one of the following dressings: (1) traditional occlusive dressing, (2) Aquacel Surgical, (3) Mepilex Border Post-Op, (4) OpSite Post-Op Visible, or (5) UrgoTul Absorb Border. The dressing assigned is placed right after surgery. Patients will be followed up to 14 days after surgery when the dressing is definitively removed and will be tracked up to 3 months to record any late complications. During the immediate postoperative period and patient hospitalization and at the ambulatory visits after discharge, every time that the dressing is changed, nurses perform the study assessments. The main study outcome will be the percentage of patients with skin integrity at all times when the dressing has been changed. Skin integrity is a composite of the absence of blisters, erosion, erythema, maceration, swelling, wound dehiscence, and purulent exudates. Secondary outcomes include time to first change of dressing; percentage of patients with presence/absence of blisters, erosion, erythema, maceration, swelling, wound dehiscence, and purulent exudates; number of dressing changes needed; days of hospital stay; and nurse and patient satisfaction. Differences in the main variable between each treatment group and group 1 will be tested by means of a chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Subgroup analyses of diabetic and non-diabetic patients, patients with a body mass index of more than 30 or not more than 30, and type of surgery (hip or knee) are planned.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will be useful for clinical decision making by giving information on the contribution of the dressings studied to the outcome of the wound and may also show which dressing offers better results depending on the characteristics of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03190447 ). Retrospectively registered on 16 June 2017.

摘要

背景

手术伤口需进行覆盖,以防止出血、吸收渗出液,并提供抵御外部污染的屏障。目前,在我们医院,骨科手术后会使用无菌纱布和低敏无纺布胶带进行传统的封闭敷料包扎。与传统敷料或胶体粘性敷料相比,一些最新的敷料已被证明可降低水泡的发生率。然而,不同类型的敷料之间及其对愈合过程整体结果的贡献尚无比较评估。

方法/设计:这是一项随机、对照、开放标签试验,旨在比较全膝关节和髋关节置换手术伤口使用的五种类型的敷料。总共550名患者将被随机分配至以下一种敷料组:(1)传统封闭敷料;(2)爱康肤银离子藻酸盐敷料;(3)美皮康术后加强型敷料;(4)优拓SSD术后可视敷料;或(5)优格透吸收性边框敷料。分配的敷料在手术后立即放置。患者将在手术后随访14天,届时敷料将被最终拆除,并将跟踪3个月以记录任何晚期并发症。在术后即刻、患者住院期间以及出院后的门诊就诊时,每次更换敷料时,护士进行研究评估。主要研究结果将是每次更换敷料时始终保持皮肤完整性的患者百分比。皮肤完整性是水泡、糜烂、红斑、浸渍、肿胀、伤口裂开和脓性渗出物均不存在的综合表现。次要结果包括首次更换敷料的时间;出现/未出现水泡、糜烂、红斑、浸渍、肿胀、伤口裂开和脓性渗出物的患者百分比;所需更换敷料的次数;住院天数;以及护士和患者的满意度。每个治疗组与第1组之间主要变量的差异将通过卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验进行测试。计划对糖尿病和非糖尿病患者、体重指数大于或不大于30的患者以及手术类型(髋关节或膝关节)进行亚组分析。

讨论

本研究结果将有助于临床决策,提供有关所研究敷料对伤口愈合结果贡献的信息,还可能表明根据患者特征哪种敷料效果更佳。

试验注册

本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03190447)。于2017年6月16日进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bda/6034240/81ac2e89fd1a/13063_2018_2755_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bda/6034240/81ac2e89fd1a/13063_2018_2755_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bda/6034240/81ac2e89fd1a/13063_2018_2755_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Open-label randomized controlled trial to compare wound dressings for patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较髋关节和膝关节置换术患者伤口敷料的开放标签随机对照试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jul 5;19(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2755-8.
2
A prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing two post-operative wound dressings used after elective hip and knee replacement; Mepilex® Border Post-Op versus Aquacel® surgical.一项比较两种择期髋关节和膝关节置换术后使用的两种术后伤口敷料的前瞻性随机对照临床试验:Mepilex® Border Post-Op 与 Aquacel® 外科。
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2020 Aug;38:100772. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100772. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Quality improvement evaluation of postoperative wound dressings in orthopaedic patients.骨科患者术后伤口敷料的质量改进评估
Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2022 May;45:100922. doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2022.100922. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
4
Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后新型伤口敷料的比较研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):454-61.
5
In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后寻找最佳伤口敷料材料:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3484-4. Epub 2017 May 11.
6
Silver-Impregnated Occlusive Dressing Reduces Rates of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty.银浸渍封闭敷料可降低全关节置换术后急性人工关节周围感染率。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):929-932. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.039. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing wound dressings used in hip and knee surgery: Aquacel and Tegaderm versus Cutiplast.一项比较髋关节和膝关节手术中使用的伤口敷料的前瞻性、随机、对照试验:爱康肤银敷料和泰德皮肤保护膜与库贴敷料的对比。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jan;88(1):18-22. doi: 10.1308/003588406X82989.
8
Is the use of modern versus conventional wound dressings warranted after primary knee and hip arthroplasty? Results of a Prospective Comparative Study.初次膝关节和髋关节置换术后使用现代伤口敷料与传统伤口敷料是否合理?一项前瞻性对照研究的结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Dec;81(4):768-75.
9
Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.手术患者局部伤口护理使用封闭敷料与纱布敷料的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):950-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.950.
10
Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估与标准伤口敷料相比,一种涂有柔软硅胶层的柔性自粘吸收性敷料在骨科或脊柱手术后的性能的临床试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Mar 7;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z.

引用本文的文献

1
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述:随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
2
Bioengineering Skin Substitutes for Wound Management-Perspectives and Challenges.生物工程皮肤替代物在创面管理中的应用——观点与挑战。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 26;25(7):3702. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073702.
3
Patient Information and Informed Consent for Research in the Elderly: Lessons Learned from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
In search of the optimal wound dressing material following total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节和膝关节置换术后寻找最佳伤口敷料材料:系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Jul;41(7):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3484-4. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Comparative study of innovative postoperative wound dressings after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后新型伤口敷料的比较研究
Acta Orthop Belg. 2015 Sep;81(3):454-61.
3
Role of Surgical Dressings in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
老年患者研究的信息与知情同意:一项随机对照试验的经验教训
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 2;10(6):1036. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061036.
4
Application of Different Doses of Tranexamic Acid Plus Traditional Chinese Medicine in Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Diabetes and Its Influence on Intraoperative Blood Loss and Postoperative Drainage.不同剂量氨甲环酸联合中药在糖尿病患者髋关节置换术中的应用及其对术中失血和术后引流的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 17;2022:1197495. doi: 10.1155/2022/1197495. eCollection 2022.
手术敷料在全关节置换术中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Sep;44(9):415-20.
4
Fracture Blisters After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后的骨折水疱
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Aug;44(8):E291-3.
5
Clinical trial to evaluate the performance of a flexible self-adherent absorbent dressing coated with a soft silicone layer compared to a standard wound dressing after orthopedic or spinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评估与标准伤口敷料相比,一种涂有柔软硅胶层的柔性自粘吸收性敷料在骨科或脊柱手术后的性能的临床试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Mar 7;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0599-z.
6
Dressings and drains in posterior spine surgery and their effect on wound complications.脊柱后路手术中的敷料与引流及其对伤口并发症的影响。
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jul;22(7):1081-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Silver-based dressings for the reduction of surgical site infection: review of current experience and recommendation for future studies.用于减少手术部位感染的银基敷料:当前经验回顾及对未来研究的建议
Burns. 2014 Dec;40 Suppl 1:S30-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.011.
8
Aquacel surgical dressing reduces the rate of acute PJI following total joint arthroplasty: a case-control study.Aquacel 外科手术敷料可降低全膝关节置换术后急性 PJI 的发生率:一项病例对照研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1098-100. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Open-label clinical trial comparing the clinical and economic effectiveness of using a polyurethane film surgical dressing with gauze surgical dressings in the care of post-operative surgical wounds.开放标签临床试验,比较使用聚氨酯薄膜手术敷料和纱布手术敷料护理术后手术伤口的临床和经济效果。
Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):285-92. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12099. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
10
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.