Ma Manjiao, Yu Xue-Rong, Wang Yi, Huang Yu-Guang, Lu Su-Fang, Tian Yuan, Bai Bing
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Chin Med Sci J. 2018 Jun 30;33(2):77-83. doi: 10.24920/11807.
Objective Although intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) has been widely used to reduce the demand for allogeneic blood transfusion, patients who use ICS approach still have not completely avoided chances of blood transfusion. This study aims to investigate the rate of allogeneic red blood cell(RBC) transfusion in patients receiving ICS, and to evaluate irrationality of allogeneic RBC transfusion and its risk factors.Methods Medical records of all patients associated with ICS approach from January 2013 to July 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Theoretical hemoglobin level after reinfusion of salvaged RBC at the end of operations was estimated. Irrational transfusion was defined as initiating allogeneic transfusion with theoretical hemoglobin above 100 g/L. The clinical variables, including the surgical department, gender, age, body weight, ratio of blood loss to estimated blood volume(EBV), salvaged blood volume and preoperative hemoglobin level were subsequently compared between patients who received rational transfusion and those did not. Logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors for irrationality of allogeneic RBC transfusion in these patients.Results Of 1487 patients with ICS approach in this study, the rate of allogeneic RBC transfusion was 31.4%(467/1487), and the rate of irrational allogeneic RBC transfusion was 26.0% (341/1313). Patients with irrational transfusion were younger (t=4.656, P<0.001), with lower body weight (t=3.910, P<0.001) and slightly lower preoperative HGB level (t=2.822, P=0.005) than those with rational transfusion, but had significantly larger salvaged blood volume (U=-10.926, P<0.001) and higher ratio of blood loss to EBV (U=-17.067, P<0.001), disregarding whether they preoperatively met anemia criteria or not (U=-1.396, P=0.163). Preoperative hemoglobin level (OR=1.975, P=0.005) and the ratio of blood loss/EBV (OR=5.392, P<0.001) were independent risk factors leading to the irrational allogeneic RBC transfusion.Conclusions The irrationality of allogeneic RBC transfusion existed in ICS patients, which may be associated with the preoperative hemoglobin level and the ratio of blood loss to EBV. Determining the HGB levels before transfusion is required to avoid unnecessary blood administration. Doctors should keep their knowledge in blood management updated and improve their awareness of rational transfusion for a better patients care.
目的 尽管术中血液回收(ICS)已被广泛用于减少异体输血需求,但采用ICS方法的患者仍未完全避免输血机会。本研究旨在调查接受ICS的患者中异体红细胞(RBC)输血率,并评估异体RBC输血的不合理性及其危险因素。
方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2014年7月所有采用ICS方法的患者的病历。估计手术结束时回输回收RBC后的理论血红蛋白水平。不合理输血定义为在理论血红蛋白高于100 g/L时开始异体输血。随后比较接受合理输血和未接受合理输血患者的临床变量,包括手术科室、性别、年龄、体重、失血量与估计血容量(EBV)的比值、回收血量和术前血红蛋白水平。进行逻辑回归分析以确定这些患者异体RBC输血不合理性的危险因素。
结果 本研究中1487例采用ICS方法的患者,异体RBC输血率为31.4%(467/1487),异体RBC不合理输血率为26.0%(341/1313)。与合理输血患者相比,不合理输血患者年龄更小(t = 4.656,P < 0.001)、体重更低(t = 3.910,P < 0.001)且术前血红蛋白水平略低(t = 2.822,P = 0.005),但回收血量显著更大(U = -10.926,P < 0.001)且失血量与EBV的比值更高(U = -17.067,P < 0.001),无论他们术前是否符合贫血标准(U = -1.396,P = 0.163)。术前血红蛋白水平(OR = 1.975,P = 0.005)和失血量/EBV比值(OR = 5.392,P < 0.001)是导致异体RBC不合理输血的独立危险因素。
结论 ICS患者存在异体RBC输血不合理的情况,这可能与术前血红蛋白水平和失血量与EBV的比值有关。输血前需要确定血红蛋白水平以避免不必要的输血。医生应不断更新血液管理知识,提高合理输血意识,以更好地为患者提供治疗。