• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为有较少遗传学背景的临床医生制定一个概念上、可重复的、基于评分表的遗传检测同意书和结果披露方法。

Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics background.

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Geisinger, 100 North Academy Avenue, Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):727-735. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0093-6. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1038/s41436-018-0093-6
PMID:29976988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6320736/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In response to genetic testing being widely ordered by nongenetics clinicians, the Consent and Disclosure Recommendations (CADRe) Workgroup of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen; clinicalgenome.org ) developed guidance to facilitate communication about genetic testing and efficiently improve the patient experience. Considering ethical, legal, and social implications, and medical factors, CADRe developed and pilot tested two rubrics addressing consent for genetic testing and results disclosure. The CADRe rubrics allow for adjusting the communication approach based on circumstances specific to patients and ordering clinicians.

METHODS

We present results of a formative survey of 66 genetics clinicians to assess the consent rubric for nine genes (MLH1, CDH1, TP53, GJB2, OTC; DMD, HTT, and CYP2C9/VKORC1). We also conducted interviews and focus groups with family and patient stakeholders (N = 18), nongenetics specialists (N = 27), and genetics clinicians (N = 32) on both rubrics.

RESULTS

Formative evaluation of the CADRe rubrics suggests key factors on which to make decisions about consent and disclosure discussions for a "typical" patient.

CONCLUSION

We propose that the CADRe rubrics include the primary issues necessary to guide communication recommendations, and are ready for pilot testing by nongenetics clinicians. Consultation with genetics clinicians can be targeted toward more complex or intensive consent and disclosure counseling.

摘要

目的

由于非遗传学临床医生广泛要求进行基因检测,临床基因组资源(ClinGen;clinicalgenome.org)的同意和披露建议(CADRe)工作组制定了指导意见,以促进有关基因检测的沟通,并有效地改善患者体验。考虑到伦理、法律和社会影响以及医疗因素,CADRe 制定并试点测试了两个针对遗传检测同意和结果披露的纲要。CADRe 纲要允许根据患者和医嘱临床医生的具体情况调整沟通方法。

方法

我们展示了对 66 名遗传学临床医生的形成性调查结果,以评估针对九个基因(MLH1、CDH1、TP53、GJB2、OTC;DMD、HTT 和 CYP2C9/VKORC1)的同意纲要。我们还对 18 名家庭和患者利益相关者、27 名非遗传学专家和 32 名遗传学临床医生进行了关于两个纲要的访谈和焦点小组讨论。

结果

对 CADRe 纲要的形成性评估表明,对于“典型”患者,在同意和披露讨论方面做出决策的关键因素。

结论

我们提出,CADRe 纲要包括指导沟通建议所需的主要问题,并且已经准备好由非遗传学临床医生进行试点测试。与遗传学临床医生的咨询可以针对更复杂或强化的同意和披露咨询进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/5b43033ce18b/nihms973105f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/6a2ecf6031d3/nihms973105f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/3c331c8f62e1/nihms973105f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/5b43033ce18b/nihms973105f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/6a2ecf6031d3/nihms973105f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/3c331c8f62e1/nihms973105f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6320736/5b43033ce18b/nihms973105f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics background.为有较少遗传学背景的临床医生制定一个概念上、可重复的、基于评分表的遗传检测同意书和结果披露方法。
Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):727-735. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0093-6. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Application of a framework to guide genetic testing communication across clinical indications.应用框架指导跨临床适应证的遗传检测沟通。
Genome Med. 2021 Apr 29;13(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00887-x.
3
Defining critical educational components of informed consent for genetic testing: views of US-based genetic counselors and medical geneticists.确定遗传检测知情同意中关键教育内容的定义:美国遗传咨询师和医学遗传学家的观点。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Oct;31(10):1165-1174. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01401-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Regulating the communication of genetic risk information: the Italian legal approach to questions of confidentiality and disclosure.规范遗传风险信息的交流:意大利法律对保密性和披露问题的处理方法。
Clin Genet. 2012 Sep;82(3):205-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01935.x. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
5
Informed consent and Huntington disease: a model for communication.知情同意与亨廷顿舞蹈症:一种沟通模式
Am J Med Genet. 1994 Apr 15;50(3):239-46. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320500306.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
7
Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.基因组学时代的知情同意
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Aug 3;10(8):a036582. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036582.
8
Information(al) matters: bioethics and the boundaries of the public and the private.信息问题:生物伦理学与公共领域和私人领域的界限
Soc Philos Policy. 2002 Summer;19(2):83-112. doi: 10.1017/s0265052502192041.
9
Ethical Implications of Direct-to-Consumer Hereditary Cancer Tests.面向消费者的遗传性癌症检测的伦理问题。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1327-1328. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2439.
10
Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.成人期发病癌症易感性的基因检测。知情同意的过程与内容。
JAMA. 1997 May 14;277(18):1467-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial chromosome reorganization reveals high plasticity of the budding and fission yeast genomes.人工染色体重组揭示了芽殖酵母和裂殖酵母基因组的高度可塑性。
Genome Biol. 2025 Jul 29;26(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03689-1.
2
Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Prompt Engineering Project.遗传性癌症综合征阳性基因筛查结果返回的聊天机器人:提示工程设计项目
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 10;11:e65848. doi: 10.2196/65848.
3
Developing a questionnaire to explore lay people's preferences for communicating hereditary conditions within families: insights from a cognitive interview study.
编制一份问卷以探究非专业人士在家庭内部交流遗传疾病方面的偏好:认知访谈研究的见解
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00783-6.
4
Assessing and attending to psychosocial concerns in genetic counseling: Proposing the BATHE method.评估并关注遗传咨询中的心理社会问题:提出BATHE方法。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e1998. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1998. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
5
Chatbot for the Return of Positive Genetic Screening Results for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: a Prompt Engineering Study.用于遗传性癌症综合征阳性基因筛查结果反馈的聊天机器人:一项提示工程研究
Res Sq. 2024 Aug 29:rs.3.rs-4986527. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4986527/v1.
6
Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.外科医生遗传素养相关知识、观念、态度和障碍:范围综述。
Can J Surg. 2024 Mar 19;67(2):E118-E127. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001523. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
7
Genetic counselors' and community clinicians' implementation and perceived barriers to informed consent during pre-test counseling for hereditary cancer risk.遗传咨询师和社区临床医生在遗传性癌症风险检测前咨询过程中实施知情同意的情况及感知到的障碍。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1887. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1887. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
8
Patient experiences and perceived value of genetic testing in inherited retinal diseases: a cross-sectional survey.遗传性视网膜疾病中基因检测的患者体验和感知价值:一项横断面调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56121-2.
9
Defining critical educational components of informed consent for genetic testing: views of US-based genetic counselors and medical geneticists.确定遗传检测知情同意中关键教育内容的定义:美国遗传咨询师和医学遗传学家的观点。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Oct;31(10):1165-1174. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01401-0. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
10
Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Clinical Practice.临床实践中的家族性高胆固醇血症基因检测。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2023 May;25(5):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s11883-023-01094-2. Epub 2023 Apr 15.