Bradley Matthew J, Kindvall Angela T, Humphries Ashley E, Jessie Elliot M, Oh John S, Malone Debra M, Bailey Jeffrey A, Perdue Philip W, Elster Eric A, Rodriguez Carlos J
1Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA.
2Department of Surgery, Uniformed University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA.
Patient Saf Surg. 2018 Jun 20;12:17. doi: 10.1186/s13037-018-0167-z. eCollection 2018.
The Joint Trauma System has demonstrated improved outcomes through coordinated research and process improvement programs. With fewer combat trauma patients, our military American College of Surgeons level 2 trauma center's ability to maintain a strong trauma Process Improvement (PI) program has become difficult. As emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are similar to trauma patients, our Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (TACS) service developed an EGS PI program analogous to what is done in trauma. We describe the implementation of our novel EGS PI program and its effect on institutional PI proficiency.
An EGS registry was developed in 2013. Inclusion criteria were based on AAST published literature. In 2015, EGS registrar and PI coordinator positions were developed and filled with existing trauma staff. A formal EGS PI program began January 1, 2016. Pre- and post-program data was compared to determine the effect including EGS PI events had on increasing yield into our trauma PI program.
In 2016, TACS saw 1001 EGS consults. Four hundred forty-four met criteria for registry inclusion. Eighty-two patients had 131 PI events; re-admission within 30 days, unplanned therapeutic intervention, and unplanned ICU admission were the most common events. Capture of EGS PI events yielded a 49% increase compared with 2015.
Overall patient volume and PI events post EGS PI program initiation exceeded those prior to implementation. These data suggest that extending trauma PI principles to EGS may be beneficial in maintaining inter-war military and/or lower volume trauma center readiness.
联合创伤系统通过协调研究和流程改进计划已取得了更好的治疗效果。随着战斗创伤患者数量的减少,我们美国外科医师学会二级军事创伤中心维持强大的创伤流程改进(PI)计划的能力变得困难。由于急诊普通外科(EGS)患者与创伤患者相似,我们的创伤与急性护理外科(TACS)服务部门制定了一个类似于创伤领域的EGS PI计划。我们描述了我们新颖的EGS PI计划的实施情况及其对机构PI熟练度的影响。
2013年建立了一个EGS登记处。纳入标准基于美国创伤外科学会发表的文献。2015年,设立了EGS登记员和PI协调员职位,并由现有的创伤科室工作人员担任。正式的EGS PI计划于2016年1月1日开始。比较计划实施前后的数据,以确定包括EGS PI事件对增加我们创伤PI计划的收益所产生的影响。
2016年,TACS共收到1001例EGS会诊。444例符合登记纳入标准。82例患者发生了131起PI事件;30天内再次入院、计划外治疗干预和计划外重症监护病房入院是最常见的事件。与2015年相比,EGS PI事件的捕获量增加了49%。
EGS PI计划启动后的总体患者数量和PI事件超过了实施前的数量。这些数据表明,将创伤PI原则扩展到EGS可能有助于维持战时军事和/或低容量创伤中心的应急准备状态。