Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
CEMO, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ann Hematol. 2018 Nov;97(11):2039-2046. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3416-4. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
In a prospective randomized study, treatment for aplastic anemia (AA) with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) and cyclosporine showed inferior hematological response and survival in comparison to horse antithymocyte globulin (h-ATG) and cyclosporine. However, h-ATG was discontinued in most Asian, South American, and European countries, where r-ATG became the only ATG formulation available. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with acquired AA who received either rabbit (n = 170) or horse (n = 85) ATG and cyclosporine for first-line treatment from 1992 to 2014 in seven referral centers in Brazil and Argentina. Overall response at 3 months was 17% (95%CI, 11-23%) for r-ATG and 44% (95%CI, 33-55%) for h-ATG (p < 0.001). At 6 months, it was 31% (95%CI, 34-39%) for r-ATG and 59% (95%CI, 48-69%) for h-ATG (p < 0.001). Overall survival at 5 years was 57% (95%CI, 47-65%) for r-ATG and 80% (95%CI, 69-87%) for h-ATG (log-rank = 0.001). Relapse was significantly higher in patients receiving h-ATG (28%; 95%CI, 17-43%) as compared to r-ATG (9.4%; 95%CI, 4-21%; log-rank, p = 0.01). The type of ATG was the only factor associated with both response and survival. The r-ATG dose varied from 1 to 5 mg/kg/day, but it did not correlate with outcomes. In summary, this is the largest multicenter study comparing the two ATG formulations in AA. Our results indicate that the dose of r-ATG does not influence hematologic response or survival in first-line therapy for acquired AA. Considering the toxicity and costs of r-ATG, our findings challenge its aggregate benefit to cyclosporine therapy and further strengthen that h-ATG should remain standard therapy in AA.
在一项前瞻性随机研究中,与马抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(h-ATG)和环孢素相比,用于治疗再生障碍性贫血(AA)的兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(r-ATG)和环孢素的血液学反应和存活率较低。然而,h-ATG 在亚洲、南美洲和欧洲的大多数国家已被停用,r-ATG 成为唯一可用的 ATG 制剂。我们回顾性评估了 1992 年至 2014 年期间,在巴西和阿根廷的七个转诊中心,连续接受兔(n=170)或马(n=85)ATG 和环孢素一线治疗的获得性 AA 患者。r-ATG 的 3 个月总反应率为 17%(95%CI,11-23%),h-ATG 为 44%(95%CI,33-55%)(p<0.001)。6 个月时,r-ATG 为 31%(95%CI,34-39%),h-ATG 为 59%(95%CI,48-69%)(p<0.001)。r-ATG 的 5 年总生存率为 57%(95%CI,47-65%),h-ATG 为 80%(95%CI,69-87%)(log-rank=0.001)。与 r-ATG 组(9.4%;95%CI,4-21%;log-rank,p=0.01)相比,接受 h-ATG 治疗的患者复发率明显更高(28%;95%CI,17-43%)。ATG 类型是唯一与反应和生存相关的因素。r-ATG 的剂量为 1 至 5mg/kg/天,但与结果无关。总之,这是比较 AA 中两种 ATG 制剂的最大多中心研究。我们的研究结果表明,r-ATG 的剂量并不影响获得性 AA 一线治疗的血液学反应或生存。考虑到 r-ATG 的毒性和成本,我们的发现对其与环孢素治疗的综合益处提出了挑战,并进一步证实 h-ATG 应继续作为 AA 的标准治疗方法。