Ziller Alison
Lecturer in Social Impact Assessment, Department of Geography and Planning, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, NSW.
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):489-502.
This article uses the public record to demonstrate the inadequacy of the current liquor licensing decision-making system in New South Wales (NSW) with regard to reducing alcohol-related harm. It describes and compares planning and liquor licensing decision-making systems and examines all decisions regarding applications for new liquor licences published by the NSW Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority in 2016. These decisions are reviewed with regard to the Authority's duty to consider social impacts. The review identifies processes and patterns of decision-making that favour the applicant, demonstrate inconsistencies, fail to use health statistics, misinterpret other statistics, make inconsistent use of reputable health research findings and treat legal obligations as mitigations. The cumulative effect is a low refusal rate. Of 168 applications, 15 were refused. Review and appeal for objectors have been severely restricted in NSW.
本文利用公开记录来证明新南威尔士州(NSW)现行的酒类许可决策系统在减少与酒精相关的危害方面存在不足。它描述并比较了规划和酒类许可决策系统,并审查了新南威尔士州独立酒类和博彩管理局在2016年公布的所有关于新酒类许可证申请的决定。这些决定根据管理局考虑社会影响的职责进行了审查。审查发现,决策过程和模式偏袒申请人,存在不一致之处,未使用健康统计数据,错误解读其他统计数据,对著名健康研究结果的使用不一致,且将法律义务视为减轻处罚的因素。其累积效应是拒绝率较低。在168份申请中,有15份被拒绝。在新南威尔士州,反对者的审查和上诉受到严格限制。