• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《2013年南澳大利亚预先医疗指示法案》:决策模式如何改变?

The South Australian Advance Care Directives Act 2013: How Has the Decision-Making Paradigm Changed?

作者信息

Brown Margaret

机构信息

Adjunct Research Fellow, University of South Australia.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):538-548.

PMID:29978653
Abstract

This article analyses how the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 SA is changing the decision-making paradigm in health care and guardianship in South Australia. It examines the background to the legislation, the main areas that have been transformed by the Act and the amendments to associated legislation. The significant changes include an increased respect for autonomy and a presumption of decision-making capacity, a new paradigm of substitute decision-making, clarification of the decision-making hierarchy, and protections for medical practitioners who decline to give treatment that would have no benefit to a dying patient. Despite some difficulties implementing the new scheme, this article argues that the Act has introduced important changes and clarifications in the law that other States would do well to follow. When it is fully implemented, the Act will ensure that the wishes of patients are respected and that doctors can follow these wishes without fear of prosecution.

摘要

本文分析了南澳大利亚州2013年的《预先医疗指示法案》如何改变该州医疗保健和监护方面的决策模式。它审视了该立法的背景、该法案带来变革的主要领域以及相关立法的修正案。重大变化包括对自主权的更多尊重和决策能力的推定、替代决策的新模式、决策层级的明确以及对拒绝给予对濒死患者无益处治疗的医生的保护。尽管在实施新方案时存在一些困难,但本文认为该法案在法律上引入了重要变革和明确规定,其他州不妨效仿。该法案全面实施后,将确保患者的意愿得到尊重,医生能够遵循这些意愿而不必担心被起诉。

相似文献

1
The South Australian Advance Care Directives Act 2013: How Has the Decision-Making Paradigm Changed?《2013年南澳大利亚预先医疗指示法案》:决策模式如何改变?
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):538-548.
2
The law and practice associated with advance directives in Canada and Australia: similarities, differences and debates.加拿大和澳大利亚与预先指示相关的法律及实践:异同点与争论
J Law Med. 2003 Aug;11(1):59-76.
3
[Are advance directives useful for doctors and what for?].[预先指示对医生有何用处及用于何事?]
Presse Med. 2013 Jun;42(6 Pt 1):e159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2012.09.027. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
4
Junior Medical Officers' knowledge of advance care directives and substitute decision making for people without decision making capacity: a cross sectional survey.初级医师对无决策能力者的预先医疗指示和替代决策的了解:一项横断面调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 18;23(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00813-9.
5
Comparing doctors' legal compliance across three Australian states for decisions whether to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment: does different law lead to different decisions?比较澳大利亚三个州的医生在决定是否 withholding 或 withdrawing 维持生命的医疗treatment 时的法律合规性:不同的法律是否会导致不同的决策?
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0249-1.
6
Advance directives affecting medical treatment choices.
J Palliat Care. 1997 Summer;13(2):5-8.
7
Junior medical doctors' decision making when using advance care directives to guide treatment for people with dementia: a cross-sectional vignette study.初级医生在使用预先指示指导痴呆患者治疗时的决策:一项横断面病例研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jul 14;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00811-x.
8
The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): new challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities.美国《统一解剖捐赠法(2006年修订版)》:平衡患者权利与医生责任面临的新挑战。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 Sep 12;2:19. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-2-19.
9
Advance directives and the promotion of autonomy: a comparative Australian statutory analysis.预先指示与自主权的促进:澳大利亚法定分析比较
J Law Med. 2010 Feb;17(4):556-81.
10
The influence of medical enduring power of attorney and advance directives on decision-making by Australian intensive care doctors.医疗持久授权书和预立医疗指示对澳大利亚重症监护医生决策的影响。
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Jun;11(2):122-8.