Suppr超能文献

外侧上髁炎的开放手术、经皮手术与关节镜手术治疗对比:一项更新的系统评价

Open vs Percutaneous vs Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis: An Updated Systematic Review.

作者信息

Riff Andrew J, Saltzman Bryan M, Cvetanovich Gregory, Frank Jonathan M, Hemu Mohamad R, Wysocki Robert W

机构信息

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun;47(6). doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0043.

Abstract

This study was performed to compare outcomes of open, arthroscopic, and percutaneous surgical techniques for lateral epicondylitis. We searched PubMed (MEDLINE) for literature published between January 1, 2004 and May 23, 2015 using these key words: lateral epicondylitis AND (surgery OR operative OR surgical OR open OR arthroscopic OR percutaneous). Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in 3 studies using 2-sample and 2-proportion Z-tests. Thirty-five studies including 1640 elbows (1055 open, 401 arthroscopic, 184 percutaneous) met the inclusion criteria. There were no differences between groups regarding duration to return to work, complication rate, or patient satisfaction. A greater proportion of patients were pain free in the open group than in the arthroscopic group (70% vs 60%). Despite the absence of a difference among techniques regarding return to work and subjective function, we recommend open débridement as the technique most likely to achieve a pain-free outcome.

摘要

本研究旨在比较开放性、关节镜下和经皮手术技术治疗外侧上髁炎的疗效。我们使用关键词“外侧上髁炎 AND(手术 OR 手术的 OR 外科手术的 OR 开放的 OR 关节镜的 OR 经皮的)”在PubMed(MEDLINE)上检索了2004年1月1日至2015年5月23日发表的文献。对3项研究报告的结果进行荟萃分析,采用双样本和双比例Z检验。35项研究纳入标准,共涉及1640例肘部患者(1055例开放性手术、401例关节镜手术、184例经皮手术)。在恢复工作时间、并发症发生率或患者满意度方面,各组之间没有差异。开放性手术组无痛患者的比例高于关节镜手术组(70%对60%)。尽管在恢复工作和主观功能方面,不同技术之间没有差异,但我们建议开放性清创术是最有可能实现无痛结局的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验