• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舟骨骨折解剖学危险因素的影像学分析;一项病例对照研究。

Radiographic analysis of anatomic risk factors for scaphoid fractures; A case-control study.

作者信息

Turan Adil, Kose Ozkan, Aktan Cemil, Unal Melih, Acar Baver, Sindel Muzaffer

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.

University of Health Sciences, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, 07100 Antalya, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.06.014
PMID:29980032
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of anatomic variations in distal radius radiographic indices in patients with or without scaphoid fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radial inclination (RI), volar tilt (VT), radial height (RH) and ulnar variance (UV) were measured on wrist radiographs of 320 patients with (Group I, n = 167) or without (Group II, n = 153) scaphoid fracture, fall on outstretched hand (FOOSH). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance for each variable. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), cutoff value, and area under the ROC curve were analyzed. Odds ratio was calculated for defined cutoff values.

RESULTS

The mean age of the groups was similar (29.3 ± 10.2 vs 31.1 ± 9.9 years, p = 0.060). RI (30.0 ± 2.9 vs 26.8 ± 2.3°) VT (11.4 ± 2.4 vs 10.5 ± 2.2°), RH (14.8 ± 2.1 vs 13.2 ± 1.9 mm), UV (-0.46 ± 1.7 vs 0.00 ± 1.5 mm) were higher in scaphoid fracture group (Gr I vs Gr II, p = 0.000, p = 0.000, p = 0.001, p = 0.012 respectively). Ulna minus variant was more prevalent in fracture group (p = 0.001). Optimal cutoff points for RI, VT, RH and UV in differentiating fractured and intact scaphoid were 28.6° (Sn = 81.0%, Sp = 26.3%), 12.2° (Sn = 80.4%, Sp = 67.1%), 14.85 mm (Sn = 80.4%, Sp = 52.1%) and 0 mm (Sn = 88.6%, Sp = 75.8%), respectively. Odds ratios for defined cutoff points for RI, VT, RH and UV were 10.4 (95% CI, 6.2-17.4), 1.8 (95% CI, 1.1-3.0), 3.7 (95% CI, 2.3-6.2) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.3-3.7) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increased RI, VT, RH and negative UV were found to be predisposing anatomical risk factors for scaphoid fracture when FOOSH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨桡骨远端影像学指标的解剖变异在有无舟骨骨折患者中的作用。

材料与方法

对320例因伸直型桡骨远端骨折(FOOSH)导致舟骨骨折的患者(I组,n = 167)和未发生舟骨骨折的患者(II组,n = 153)的腕部X线片测量桡骨倾斜度(RI)、掌倾角(VT)、桡骨高度(RH)和尺骨变异(UV)。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估各变量的诊断性能。分析敏感性(Sn)、特异性(Sp)、截断值和ROC曲线下面积。计算定义截断值的比值比。

结果

两组的平均年龄相似(29.3±10.2岁 vs 31.1±9.9岁,p = 0.060)。舟骨骨折组的RI(30.0±2.9° vs 26.8±2.3°)、VT(11.4±2.4° vs 10.5±2.2°)、RH(14.8±2.1 mm vs 13.2±1.9 mm)、UV(-0.46±1.7 mm vs 0.00±1.5 mm)更高(I组 vs II组,p分别为0.000、0.000、0.001、0.012)。尺骨负变异在骨折组更常见(p = 0.001)。区分骨折和完整舟骨时RI、VT、RH和UV的最佳截断点分别为28.6°(Sn = 81.0%,Sp = 26.3%)、12.2°(Sn = 80.4%,Sp = 67.1%)、14.85 mm(Sn = 80.4%,Sp = 52.1%)和0 mm(Sn = 88.6%,Sp = 75.8%)。RI、VT、RH和UV定义截断值的比值比分别为10.4(95%CI,6.2 - 17.4)、1.8(95%CI,1.1 - 3.0)、3.7(95%CI,2.3 - 6.2)和2.2(95%CI,1.3 - 3.7)。

结论

发现当发生伸直型桡骨远端骨折时,RI、VT、RH增加和UV为负是舟骨骨折的解剖学易感危险因素。

相似文献

1
Radiographic analysis of anatomic risk factors for scaphoid fractures; A case-control study.舟骨骨折解剖学危险因素的影像学分析;一项病例对照研究。
Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Comparison of Radiographic Measurement Parameters of the Wrist in Patients with and without Scaphoid Fracture after Fall on an Outstretched Hand.比较手掌伸展摔倒后手舟骨骨折患者与无骨折患者腕关节的影像学测量参数。
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(3):156-163. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/021.
3
Ulnar variance in scaphoid nonunion.舟状骨骨不连的尺侧偏斜。
Arch Iran Med. 2013 May;16(5):301-2.
4
Ulnar variance and scaphoid fracture.尺骨变异与舟骨骨折
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010 Mar;35(3):195-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193409352281. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
5
Is it really necessary to restore radial anatomic parameters after distal radius fractures?桡骨远端骨折后真的有必要恢复桡骨解剖参数吗?
Injury. 2014 Dec;45 Suppl 6:S21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
6
Ulnar Variance in Scaphoid Fractures: Retrospective Analysis of 182 Cases.舟骨骨折中的尺骨变异:182例病例的回顾性分析
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Mar;24(1):13-16. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500036.
7
Morphological risk factors for scaphoid fracture: a case-control study.腕舟骨骨折的形态学危险因素:病例对照研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):133-141. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02101-y. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Identify Scaphoid Fractures in Radiographs.使用卷积神经网络开发和验证深度学习模型以识别 X 光片中的舟状骨骨折
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e216096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6096.
9
Clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in children.儿童临床疑似舟状骨骨折。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun;29(4):352-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181a5a667.
10
Analysis of ulnar variance as a risk factor for developing scaphoid nonunion.尺骨变异作为舟骨不愈合发生风险因素的分析。
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2015 May-Jun;59(3):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
An Umbrella Review and Updated Meta-Analysis of Imaging Modalities in Occult Scaphoid and Hip and Femoral Fractures.隐匿性舟骨、髋部和股骨骨折影像学检查方法的伞状综述与更新的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 27;13(13):3769. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133769.
2
Morphological risk factors for scaphoid fracture: a case-control study.腕舟骨骨折的形态学危险因素:病例对照研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Feb;49(1):133-141. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02101-y. Epub 2022 Sep 27.