Department of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Informatics, University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1640-1646. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
To assess undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) in radiology and medicine.
A web-based questionnaire was designed using SurveyMonkey, and was sent out to students at three major medical schools. It consisted of various sections aiming to evaluate the students' prior knowledge of AI in radiology and beyond, as well as their attitude towards AI in radiology specifically and in medicine in general. Respondents' anonymity was ensured.
A total of 263 students (166 female, 94 male, median age 23 years) responded to the questionnaire. Around 52% were aware of the ongoing discussion about AI in radiology and 68% stated that they were unaware of the technologies involved. Respondents agreed that AI could potentially detect pathologies in radiological examinations (83%) but felt that AI would not be able to establish a definite diagnosis (56%). The majority agreed that AI will revolutionise and improve radiology (77% and 86%), while disagreeing with statements that human radiologists will be replaced (83%). Over two-thirds agreed on the need for AI to be included in medical training (71%). In sub-group analyses male and tech-savvy respondents were more confident on the benefits of AI and less fearful of these technologies.
Contrary to anecdotes published in the media, undergraduate medical students do not worry that AI will replace human radiologists, and are aware of the potential applications and implications of AI on radiology and medicine. Radiology should take the lead in educating students about these emerging technologies.
• Medical students are aware of the potential applications and implications of AI in radiology and medicine in general. • Medical students do not worry that the human radiologist or physician will be replaced. • Artificial intelligence should be included in medical training.
评估医学生对放射科和医学人工智能的态度。
使用 SurveyMonkey 设计了一个基于网络的问卷,并分发给三所主要医学院的学生。它由多个部分组成,旨在评估学生对放射科人工智能的先验知识,以及他们对放射科人工智能和医学的总体态度。确保了受访者的匿名性。
共有 263 名学生(166 名女性,94 名男性,中位数年龄 23 岁)对问卷做出了回应。约有 52%的人意识到放射科人工智能的讨论正在进行中,68%的人表示他们不知道所涉及的技术。受访者一致认为人工智能有可能在放射学检查中检测到病变(83%),但认为人工智能无法做出明确的诊断(56%)。大多数人同意人工智能将彻底改变和改善放射科(77%和 86%),同时不同意人类放射科医生将被取代的说法(83%)。超过三分之二的人同意需要将人工智能纳入医学培训(71%)。在亚组分析中,男性和精通技术的受访者对人工智能的益处更有信心,对这些技术的恐惧程度较低。
与媒体上发表的轶事相反,医学生并不担心人工智能会取代人类放射科医生,并且意识到人工智能在放射学和医学上的潜在应用和影响。放射科应该带头教育学生了解这些新兴技术。
医学生意识到人工智能在放射学和一般医学中的潜在应用和影响。
医学生并不担心放射科医生或医生会被取代。
人工智能应该纳入医学培训。