Suppr超能文献

英国肾移植失败的原因:2000 年至 2013 年英国肾脏注册处和国民保健署血液与移植数据的趋势。

Causes of renal allograft failure in the UK: trends in UK Renal Registry and National Health Service Blood and Transplant data from 2000 to 2013.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):355-364. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy168.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvement in long-term renal allograft survival is impeded by incomplete or erroneous coding of causes of allograft loss. This study reports 13-year trends in causes of graft failure across the UK.

METHODS

National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) and UK Renal Registry data were linked to describe UK kidney patients transplanted in 2000-13. NHSBT graft failure categories were used, with 'other' recoded when free text was available. Adjusted analyses examined the influence of age, ethnicity and donor type on causes of graft failure.

RESULTS

In 22 730 recipients, 5389 (23.7%) grafts failed within a median follow-up of 5 years. The two most frequent causes were death with a functioning graft (40.8%) and alloimmune pathology (25.0%). Graft survival was higher in recipients who were younger (mean 47.3 versus 50.7 years), received a pre-emptive transplant (20.2% versus 10.4%), spent less time on dialysis (median 1.6 versus 2.4 years) and received a living donor transplant (36.3% versus 22.2%), with no differences by sex, ethnicity or human leucocyte antigen mismatch. Allograft failure within 2 years of transplantation fell from 12.5% (2000-4) to 9.8% (2009-13). Surgical- and alloimmune-related failures decreased over time while death with a functioning graft became more common. Age, ethnicity and donor type were factors in recurrent primary disease and alloimmune pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2000 there have been reductions in surgical and alloimmune graft failures in the UK. However, graft failure codes need to be revised if they are to remain useful and effective in epidemiological and quality improvement trials.

摘要

背景

由于对移植物丢失的原因进行不完全或错误的编码,长期肾移植存活率的提高受到了阻碍。本研究报告了英国在 13 年内导致移植物失败的原因的趋势。

方法

国家卫生服务血液和移植(NHSBT)和英国肾脏登记处的数据被联系起来,以描述 2000-13 年期间在英国接受移植的肾脏患者。使用 NHSBT 移植物失败类别,并在有自由文本时重新编码“其他”。调整后的分析研究了年龄、种族和供体类型对移植物失败原因的影响。

结果

在 22730 名受者中,5389 名(23.7%)移植物在中位随访 5 年内失败。最常见的两个原因是带功能移植物的死亡(40.8%)和同种异体免疫病理学(25.0%)。在较年轻的受者(平均年龄 47.3 岁与 50.7 岁)、接受预防性移植(20.2%与 10.4%)、透析时间较短(中位数 1.6 年与 2.4 年)和接受活体供者移植(36.3%与 22.2%)的受者中,移植物存活率更高,且不受性别、种族或人类白细胞抗原不匹配的影响。移植后 2 年内的移植物衰竭率从 12.5%(2000-4 年)下降到 9.8%(2009-13 年)。随着时间的推移,手术和同种免疫相关的衰竭减少,而带功能移植物的死亡变得更为常见。年龄、种族和供体类型是复发性原发性疾病和同种异体免疫病理学的因素。

结论

自 2000 年以来,英国的手术和同种异体移植物衰竭率有所下降。然而,如果要使这些代码在流行病学和质量改进试验中仍然有用和有效,就需要对其进行修订。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验