OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina.
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Oct;33(10):3143-3146. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
Patient optimization is becoming increasingly important before arthroplasty to ensure outcomes. It has been suggested that depression is a modifiable risk factor that should be corrected preoperatively. It remains to be determined whether psychological intervention before surgery will improve outcomes. We theorized that the use of preoperative depression scales to predict postoperative outcomes may be influenced by the pain and functional disability of arthritis. To determine whether depression is a modifiable risk factor that should be corrected preoperatively we asked the following questions: (1) What is the prevalence of depression in arthroplasty patients preoperatively? (2) Do depressive symptoms improve after surgery? (3) Is preoperative depression associated with outcome?
Patients scheduled for surgery completed a patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess the presence and severity of depression pre-operatively and one year post-operatively.
Sixty-five of the 282 patients had a PHQ-9 score >10 indicating moderate depression and 57 (88%) improved to <10 postoperatively (P = .0012). Ten patients had a PHQ-9 score >20 indicating severe depression and 9 (90%) improved to <10 postoperatively (P = .10). Of the 65 patients who had a PHQ-9 score >10 preoperatively, the median postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (N = 40) was 92.3, while the median postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (N = 25) was 84.6. The median postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in nondepressed patients were 96.2 and 84.6, respectively (P = .9041).
By diminishing pain and improving function through arthroplasty, depression symptoms improve significantly. Patients with depressive symptoms preoperatively had similar postoperative outcome scores compared to non-depressed patients. Patients should not be denied surgical intervention through optimization programs that include a depression scale threshold.
III.
患者优化在关节置换术前变得越来越重要,以确保手术效果。有人认为,抑郁是一种可以改变的风险因素,应该在术前进行纠正。目前尚不清楚手术前的心理干预是否会改善结果。我们推测,使用术前抑郁量表来预测术后结果可能会受到关节炎疼痛和功能障碍的影响。为了确定抑郁是否是一种可以改变的风险因素,是否应该在术前进行纠正,我们提出了以下问题:(1)术前关节炎患者的抑郁患病率是多少?(2)手术后抑郁症状是否会改善?(3)术前抑郁与结果是否相关?
计划接受手术的患者在术前和术后一年完成患者健康问卷(PHQ-9),以评估抑郁的存在和严重程度。
282 名患者中有 65 名 PHQ-9 评分>10,表明存在中度抑郁,57 名(88%)术后评分<10(P=0.0012)。10 名患者 PHQ-9 评分>20,表明存在严重抑郁,9 名(90%)术后评分<10(P=0.10)。在术前 PHQ-9 评分>10 的 65 名患者中,40 名接受髋关节置换术的患者术后髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分(N=40)中位数为 92.3,而 25 名接受膝关节置换术的患者术后膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(N=25)中位数为 84.6。非抑郁患者的术后髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分中位数分别为 96.2 和 84.6(P=0.9041)。
通过关节置换术减轻疼痛和改善功能,抑郁症状显著改善。术前有抑郁症状的患者与无抑郁症状的患者术后结果评分相似。不应该通过包括抑郁量表阈值的优化程序来拒绝手术干预。
III。