• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减压器的安全性和有效性:一项多中心临床注册研究-RE-duce 研究。

Safety and efficacy of the reducer: A multi-center clinical registry - REDUCE study.

机构信息

Unit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Unit of Cardiovascular Interventions, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.116. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.116
PMID:29983248
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronary sinus (CS) Reducer is a novel device designed to aid in the management and to improve quality of life of patients with severe angina symptoms refractory to optimal medical and interventional therapies. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the Reducer in a real-world cohort of patients presenting with refractory angina.

METHODS

One hundred forty-one consecutive patients were treated with CS Reducer implantation. The primary efficacy endpoint was reduction in angina symptoms from baseline as assessed by Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class status and Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores. The primary safety endpoint was successful Reducer device delivery and deployment in the absence of any device-related events.

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in 139 (98.6%) patients. Reducer implantation was not obtained in 2 (1.4%) patients because of unfavorable anatomy of the CS. There were no CS perforations, cardiac tamponade, peri-procedural death or myocardial infarction during a median follow-up of 14 months (range from 6- to 70-month). In patients undergoing Reducer implantation, mean CCS class improved from 3.05 ± 0.53 at baseline to 1.63 ± 0.98 at follow-up (p < 0.001). Overall, 113 (81%) patients experienced at least 1 CCS improvement, and 63 (45%) patients at least 2 CCS-class improvement. All SAQ items improved significantly (p < 0.001 for all) and translated into a significant reduction in the mean number of anti-ischemic drugs prescribed (2.37 ± 0.97 vs 2.17 ± 0.95; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world multi-center experience, implantation of the CS Reducer appears safe, and efficacious in reducing symptoms of angina and improving quality of life.

摘要

背景

冠状窦(CS)减容器是一种新型装置,旨在帮助管理和提高对最佳药物和介入治疗有反应的严重心绞痛患者的生活质量。本研究旨在评估该减容器在难治性心绞痛患者的真实世界队列中的安全性和疗效。

方法

141 例连续患者接受 CS 减容器植入治疗。主要疗效终点是通过加拿大心血管学会(CCS)分级和西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)评分评估的心绞痛症状从基线的降低。主要安全性终点是成功输送和部署减容器,而无任何与器械相关的不良事件。

结果

139 例(98.6%)患者获得了手术成功。由于 CS 的不利解剖结构,2 例(1.4%)患者无法植入减容器。在中位随访 14 个月(6-70 个月)期间,没有 CS 穿孔、心脏压塞、围手术期死亡或心肌梗死。在接受减容器植入的患者中,CCS 分级从基线时的 3.05±0.53 改善至随访时的 1.63±0.98(p<0.001)。总体而言,113 例(81%)患者至少有 1 次 CCS 改善,63 例(45%)患者至少有 2 次 CCS 分级改善。所有 SAQ 项目均显著改善(所有项目 p<0.001),并导致抗缺血药物的平均处方数量显著减少(2.37±0.97 与 2.17±0.95;p=0.003)。

结论

在真实世界的多中心经验中,CS 减容器的植入似乎是安全且有效的,可以减轻心绞痛症状并提高生活质量。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of the reducer: A multi-center clinical registry - REDUCE study.减压器的安全性和有效性:一项多中心临床注册研究-RE-duce 研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:40-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.116. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina: A Single-Center Experience.冠状动脉窦缩窄植入术治疗慢性难治性心绞痛:单中心经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):784-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.251.
3
Usefulness of Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation for the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Angina Pectoris.经冠状窦减少器植入术治疗慢性难治性心绞痛的效果。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Jan 15;139:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.045. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
The efficacy of coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina-A systematic review of the literature.冠状动脉窦缩小器在难治性心绞痛患者中的疗效——文献系统评价
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):775-779. doi: 10.1111/joic.12560. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Coronary sinus narrowing for the treatment of refractory angina: a multicentre prospective open-label clinical study (the REDUCER-I study).经冠状静脉窦缩窄治疗难治性心绞痛的多中心前瞻性开放标签临床研究(REDCER-I 研究)。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Sep 20;17(7):561-568. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00873.
6
Coronary sinus Reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: A multicenter initial experience.用于治疗难治性心绞痛的冠状窦减小装置:多中心初步经验。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2023 May;42(5):413-420. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2022.05.010. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
7
Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study.接受冠状窦减少器植入术患者的长期结果 - 一项多中心研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):424-428. doi: 10.1002/clc.23566. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Safety and efficacy of Coronary Sinus Reducer implantation at 2-year follow-up.经 2 年随访的冠状窦缩减器植入术的安全性和疗效。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;292:87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina: A Meta-analysis.经冠状窦减少术治疗难治性心绞痛的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Mar;38(3):376-383. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.12.009. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
10
Coronary sinus reducer stent for the treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, safety feasibility first-in-man study.用于治疗慢性顽固性心绞痛的冠状静脉窦减压器支架:一项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、安全性可行性人体首例研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 1;49(17):1783-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.061.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of coronary sinus reducer in patients with refractory angina and chronic total occlusion.冠状动脉窦减压器在难治性心绞痛和慢性完全闭塞患者中的疗效
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02723-3.
2
Coronary Sinus Reducer Therapy for Refractory Angina and its Role in Modern Interventional Practice: A Contemporary Review.冠状动脉窦减容术治疗顽固性心绞痛及其在现代介入治疗中的作用:当代综述
Interv Cardiol. 2024 Jul 9;19:e11. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.45. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer in the Therapy of Refractory Angina Pectoris-Mid-Term Results of the Real-Life Cohort.
冠状动脉窦减压器治疗难治性心绞痛的安全性和有效性——真实世界队列的中期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):4413. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154413.
4
A budget impact model and a cost-utility analysis of reducer device (Neovasc) in patients with refractory angina.难治性心绞痛患者使用减压器装置(Neovasc)的预算影响模型及成本效用分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 18;11:1307534. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1307534. eCollection 2024.
5
Refractory angina pectoris: a 20-year (2003-2022) bibliometric analysis.难治性心绞痛:一项20年(2003 - 2022年)的文献计量分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 24;10:1228201. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1228201. eCollection 2023.
6
The Coronary Sinus Reducer - Clinical Evidence and New Perspectives On An Emerging Tool in the Treatment of Refractory Angina.冠状静脉窦减压器——治疗顽固性心绞痛的新兴工具的临床证据与新视角
Heart Int. 2020 Aug 4;14(1):29-33. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.1.29. eCollection 2020.
7
Contemporary Management of Refractory Angina.当代难治性心绞痛的管理。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2022 Jul;11(3):279-292. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.03.002.
8
Son of a Lesser God: The Case of Cell Therapy for Refractory Angina.《次神之子:难治性心绞痛的细胞治疗案例》
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 6;8:709795. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.709795. eCollection 2021.
9
Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation - A multicenter study.接受冠状窦减少器植入术患者的长期结果 - 一项多中心研究。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):424-428. doi: 10.1002/clc.23566. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
10
Coronary sinus narrowing for the treatment of refractory angina: a multicentre prospective open-label clinical study (the REDUCER-I study).经冠状静脉窦缩窄治疗难治性心绞痛的多中心前瞻性开放标签临床研究(REDCER-I 研究)。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Sep 20;17(7):561-568. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00873.