Klassen Peter Douglas, Hsu Wellington K, Martens Frederic, Inzana Jason A, van den Brink Wimar A, Groff Michael W, Thomé Claudius
Department of Neurosurgery, St. Bonifatius Hospital, Lingen, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 26;10:349-357. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S164129. eCollection 2018.
Lumbar discectomy patients with large annular defects are at a high risk for reherniation and reoperation, which could be mitigated through the use of an annular closure device (ACD). To identify the most effective treatment pathways for this high-risk population, it is critical to understand the clinical outcomes and socioeconomic costs among reoperated patients as well as the utility of ACD for minimizing reoperation risk.
This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of an ACD. All 550 patients (both ACD treated and control) from the RCT with follow-up data through 2 years were included in this analysis (69 reoperated and 481 non-reoperated). Reoperations were defined as any revision surgery of the index level, regardless of indication. Equivalent U.S. Medicare expenditures for reoperations were estimated through cost multipliers derived from the commercially available PearlDiver database.
A significantly greater number of control patients (45/278; 16%) compared to ACD patients (24/272; 9%) underwent a revision surgery at the index level within 2 years of followup (=0.01). At 2 years of follow-up, the reoperated patients had significantly worse Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual analog scale for leg and back pain scores compared to their non-reoperated counterparts (<0.0001). The total estimated direct medical costs for reoperation were US $952,348 ($13,802 per reoperated patient), with control patients accounting for the majority of this cost burden ($565,188; 59%).
Post-discectomy reoperation is associated with significantly increased patient morbidity, missed work, and direct treatment costs in a population at high risk for reherniation. Annular closure helped minimize this clinical and socioeconomic burden by reducing the incidence of reoperation by nearly 50% (16% control vs 9% ACD).
腰椎间盘切除术患者若存在较大的纤维环缺损,再次疝出和再次手术的风险较高,可通过使用纤维环闭合装置(ACD)来降低这种风险。为了确定针对这一高风险人群最有效的治疗途径,了解再次手术患者的临床结局和社会经济成本以及ACD在降低再次手术风险方面的效用至关重要。
这是一项对一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验(RCT)的事后分析,该试验旨在研究一种ACD的安全性和有效性。来自该RCT的所有550例患者(包括接受ACD治疗的患者和对照组患者),若有2年的随访数据,则纳入本分析(69例再次手术患者和481例未再次手术患者)。再次手术定义为对初次手术节段进行的任何翻修手术,无论其适应证如何。通过从商业可用的PearlDiver数据库得出的成本乘数估算再次手术的美国医疗保险等效支出。
在随访的2年内,与ACD组患者(24/272;9%)相比,对照组患者(45/278;16%)在初次手术节段接受翻修手术的人数显著更多(P=0.01)。在随访2年时,与未再次手术的患者相比,再次手术的患者的Oswestry功能障碍指数评分以及腿部和背部疼痛的视觉模拟量表评分明显更差(P<0.0001)。再次手术的总估计直接医疗费用为952,348美元(每位再次手术患者13,802美元),其中对照组患者占该成本负担的大部分(565,188美元;59%)。
在再次疝出风险较高的人群中,椎间盘切除术后再次手术与患者发病率显著增加、误工以及直接治疗成本增加相关。纤维环闭合通过将再次手术的发生率降低近50%(对照组为16%,ACD组为9%),有助于将这种临床和社会经济负担降至最低。