• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达州和纽约州工人赔偿案例中的腰椎间盘切除术和再次手术:治疗趋势是否与其他支付类型相似?

Lumbar Discectomy and Reoperation Among Workers' Compensation Cases in Florida and New York: Are Treatment Trends Similar to Other Payer Types?

机构信息

Department of Surgery (Dr Ammerman, Dr Wind); Department of Neurological Surgery, George Washington University Hospital (Dr Wind); Department of Orthopedic Surgery (Dr Goldsmith), Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington DC; and Telos Partners, LLC, Denver, Colorado (Dr Inzana).

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):e478-e484. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001943.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001943
PMID:32890218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7478206/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to better understand current treatment trends and revision rates for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in the workers' compensation (WC) population compared with other payer types.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of outpatient claims data from Florida and New York during 2014 to 2016.

RESULTS

WC patients were less likely to undergo discectomy in Florida (15% vs 19%; P < 0.001) and New York (10% vs 15%; P < 0.001). The odds of WC patients undergoing revision discectomy were 1.5 times greater than patients covered by private payers or all other non-WC payers (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

WC patients undergo discectomy significantly less often than non-WC counterparts, which may be related to a higher risk of reoperation. New evidence-based treatments, such as annular repair, may be critical to advancing care in this unique population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在更好地了解在工人赔偿(WC)人群中与其他支付类型相比,腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的当前治疗趋势和翻修率。

方法

这是对佛罗里达州和纽约 2014 年至 2016 年门诊索赔数据的回顾性分析。

结果

在佛罗里达州(15%比 19%;P < 0.001)和纽约(10%比 15%;P < 0.001),WC 患者接受椎间盘切除术的可能性较小。与私人支付者或所有其他非 WC 支付者相比,WC 患者接受翻修椎间盘切除术的可能性增加了 1.5 倍(P = 0.002)。

结论

与非 WC 患者相比,WC 患者接受椎间盘切除术的频率明显降低,这可能与再次手术的风险较高有关。环状修复等新的循证治疗方法可能对推进这一独特人群的护理至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/e4b6f5f65598/joem-62-e478-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/bf52926d7f0a/joem-62-e478-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/89e86462c892/joem-62-e478-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/e4b6f5f65598/joem-62-e478-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/bf52926d7f0a/joem-62-e478-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/89e86462c892/joem-62-e478-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e0/7478206/e4b6f5f65598/joem-62-e478-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Lumbar Discectomy and Reoperation Among Workers' Compensation Cases in Florida and New York: Are Treatment Trends Similar to Other Payer Types?佛罗里达州和纽约州工人赔偿案例中的腰椎间盘切除术和再次手术:治疗趋势是否与其他支付类型相似?
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):e478-e484. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001943.
2
Treatment of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation With or Without Fusion in Workers' Compensation Subjects.工伤赔偿对象复发性腰椎间盘突出症伴或不伴融合术的治疗
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42(14):E864-E870. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002057.
3
The Impact of Worker's Compensation Claims on Outcomes and Costs Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.工伤赔偿申请对颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后结果及费用的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jun 15;40(12):948-53. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000873.
4
Time to Surgery Affects Return to Work Rates for Workers' Compensation Patients With Single-Level Lumbar Disk Herniation.手术时间对单节段腰椎间盘突出症工人赔偿患者的工作恢复率的影响。
Orthopedics. 2021 Jan 1;44(1):e43-e49. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20201202-06. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Spine surgery outcomes in a workers' compensation cohort.工伤赔偿队列中的脊柱手术结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Sep;82(9):625-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06152.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
6
Predictors of reoperation-free survival following decompression-alone lumbar spine surgery for on-the-job injuries.因工伤接受单纯减压腰椎手术后无再次手术生存的预测因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;135:41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.012. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
Socioeconomic outcomes of combined spine surgery and functional restoration in workers' compensation spinal disorders with matched controls.在有匹配对照的工伤脊柱疾病中,联合脊柱手术与功能恢复的社会经济结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Mar 1;23(5):598-605; discussion 606. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00013.
8
Results of elective lumbar discectomy for patients involved in the workers' compensation system.参与工伤赔偿系统的患者的选择性腰椎间盘切除术结果。
J Spinal Disord. 1998 Aug;11(4):277-82.
9
5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.不同类型腰椎手术后的5年再次手术率。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Apr 1;23(7):814-20. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199804010-00015.
10
How do coverage policies influence practice patterns, safety, and cost of initial lumbar fusion surgery? A population-based comparison of workers' compensation systems.覆盖政策如何影响初始腰椎融合手术的实践模式、安全性和成本?工人赔偿制度的基于人群的比较。
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Annular closure device lowers reoperation risk 4 years after lumbar discectomy.环形闭合装置降低腰椎间盘切除术后4年的再次手术风险。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2019 Sep 4;12:327-335. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S220151. eCollection 2019.
2
Closing the Treatment Gap for Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Large Annular Defects: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes in this High-risk Population.缩小伴有大的椎间盘环缺损的腰椎间盘突出症患者的治疗差距:对这一高危人群的技术和结果的系统评价
Cureus. 2019 May 7;11(5):e4613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4613.
3
Three-year results from a randomized trial of lumbar discectomy with annulus fibrosus occlusion in patients at high risk for reherniation.
在有再次突出高风险的患者中,行纤维环缝合术的腰椎间盘切除术的随机试验 3 年结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019 Jul;161(7):1389-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03948-8. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
Comparison of treatments for lumbar disc herniation: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.腰椎间盘突出症治疗方法的比较:网络荟萃分析的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14410. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014410.
5
Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors of Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Retrospective Analysis of Three Hundred Twenty-One Cases.临床特点与复发性腰椎间盘突出症的危险因素:三百二十一例回顾性分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 1;43(21):1463-1469. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002655.
6
Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial.通过使用一种新型的椎间盘环闭合装置,可以减少与不良临床和社会经济结果相关的腰椎间盘切除术后再次手术:一项为期2年的随机对照试验结果
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 26;10:349-357. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S164129. eCollection 2018.
7
Cost-effectiveness of a Bone-anchored Annular Closure Device Versus Conventional Lumbar Discectomy in Treating Lumbar Disc Herniations.骨锚定环形闭合装置与传统腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成本效益比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jan 1;44(1):5-16. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002746.
8
Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial.腰椎间盘切除术预防再突出的环扎闭合术:一项随机临床试验。
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2278-2287. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 3.
9
Association of Annular Defect Width After Lumbar Discectomy With Risk of Symptom Recurrence and Reoperation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.腰椎间盘切除术后环状缺损宽度与症状复发和再手术风险的关系:系统评价和比较研究的荟萃分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 1;43(5):E308-E315. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002501.
10
What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?全国范围内初次椎间盘切除术后翻修椎间盘切除术的发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Nov;475(11):2752-2762. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5467-6. Epub 2017 Aug 28.